User talk:What is your profession?

Don't trash crappy builds randomly. Let the voters shoot them down. Tycn 06:13, 28 October 2007 (CET)

Read out policies before making random changes. Tags are determined by votes, not your opinions. Tycn 06:21, 28 October 2007 (CET)

Don't change it again. If you hate it so much, vote on it. This is (supposedly) a democracy. Tycn 06:22, 28 October 2007 (CET)

You've recently begun selectively deleting votes until a build has the precise quality that you wish for it. This is hardly honest. And even if you did that, I still would not.

The facts that you delete any vote you disagree with and that you're also a moron makes that essentially pointless, don't you think? &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by What is your profession? (contribs).


 * (EC)Please sign your comments with 4 tildes (~) and do not breach NPA by calling people morons and such. [[Image:Hammer And Sickle.png|19px]]Viet •  t  /  c  06:26, 28 October 2007 (CET)

Selectively deleting votes? I've only deleted votes that 1, are in trial where no votes are allowed yet, 2, show a lack of understanding of the build or the game, or 3, don't give a good reason. Point me to where I 'selectively deleted votes' in a biased manner. Tycn 06:25, 28 October 2007 (CET)
 * http://www.pvxwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Build:R/N_Touch_Ranger&action=rate
 * The 'Ignore all rules' rule says I'm allowed to act logically and reasonably. I tagged a trash build as trash.  It doesn't get any more logical than that.  Now kindly stop spamming my talkpage. &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by What is your profession? (contribs).
 * Read the policy again, it doesn't supersede existing policies. Continue to violate policy and I'll ban you.  [[Image:Defiant Elements Sig Test 2.JPG|50x19px]]  *Defiant Elements*   +talk  06:36, 28 October 2007 (CET)
 * (conflict)Only, you know, he didn't remove any votes there.
 * From "ignore all rules": "This policy is not an excuse for breaking the rules. Site policy exists for a reason; you had better have a good reason for violating it." & "You're still responsible for reasonably foreseeable effects of your actions on the wiki and towards other users." & "A user may not use this policy as a carte blanche or a trump card.", don't break NPA.–Ichigo724[[Image:Ichigo-signature.jpg]] 06:38, 28 October 2007 (CET)
 * One, those votes aren't an accurate reflection of the build's potential (low DPS, but somewhat hard to counter), ie 5 for effectiveness. And two, it was Auron who removed those votes. As for that policy, well, it's unreasonable to trash/change tags that don't match up to the ratings. That's what the site is centred on, a player maintained, democratic system. I'm very flattered, you thinking I'm Auron and all, but no. Tycn 06:41, 28 October 2007 (CET)
 * The result is the same and that's all I care about. I've tried contributing and discussing with you and your stupid friends, but it really is pointless.  You're a fucking retard and there's no way round it.  Read Defiant Elements comment again.  Read it carefully, a few times.  Also stop spamming my fucking talk page.

Please ban before any further vandalism or NPA breaches. Viet •  t  /  c  06:51, 28 October 2007 (CET)
 * seconded.[[Image:Darksig.JPG]] 20:14, 8 November 2007 (CET)