PvXwiki talk:Avoiding common mistakes in build articles

Lol, i know theres our format out there already, but who cares to read such a wordy article? I've just made a more pictorial one citing what to do.. blah blah blah BaineTheBotter 09:09, 2 June 2007 (CEST)

I appreciated that, useful article. Kratos Gowar 9.27 (GMT+1), 2 June 2007.

Moved your article out of build space. Go see Raedem page as he is also doing a guide section you may want to help out on. PvX:NoBias is his awnser to the same subject your diving into. I appreciate the 'personal' feeling of this guide, and it makes some good comparisons. You might be able to help him soften his approach up a bit. Shireen sysop  09:50, 2 June 2007 (CEST)

Wait, so it's a good example where the attribute values are not shown? - Krowman    01:43, 3 June 2007 (CEST)
 * Errr, of course not. Changed "bad"<->"good", but didn't find a nice way yet to keep the standard order (first bad, then good). --Hhhippo 02:20, 3 June 2007 (CEST)

This
is in direct conflict with PvXwiki:Style_and_formatting, which was the policy on GuildWiki and has been the policy for a while... at least longer than this one. which one do we follow? -- Nova   --  (contribs) 04:40, 18 August 2007 (CEST)
 * since the style and formatting#equipment is older and actually better-known, i'd say we follow that one. took some time since someone noticed, huh? "bump" - Y0_ich_halt 17:28, 11 September 2007 (CEST)

Good Example
The Good example is terrible. &mdash; Rapta   (talk|contribs) 21:25, 23 March 2008 (EDT)
 * Where the hell do these builds come from? Seriously, just put Cripshot or Shock Axe for the example. --[[image:GoD Sig3.jpg|20px]] Guild of  Deals  11:38, 28 March 2008 (EDT)

Bad Example on how to write a page
Why is it always showing the Bad example first in each section EXCEPT one! they should all be the same <3 --86.155.123.237 11:59, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * i think the more appropriate question might be Why is an article about writing good articles so shitty?. Seriously, this might be one of the worst pages i have read on the wiki 70.22.228.190 03:46, 25 November 2011 (UTC)