User talk:Garrik Fel

"Rangers are pretty useless in PvP" Is this a joke? --Edru viransu 08:41, 15 July 2007 (CEST)

It's my opinion (also you forgot "compared to the other professions." That's kind of important for context). Also, Put yourself in this hypothetical situation:

You're in HA, you have a great build team, and you have room for one extra player. Who do you take?


 * Ranger
 * Warior
 * Monk
 * Mesmer
 * Necromancer
 * Elementalist
 * Assassin
 * Ritualist
 * Paragon
 * Dervish

If I had to choose, I would Rank Ranger 6th or 7th out of ten. Then again my experiences say it's generally better to have an extra healer/mesmer/ele/necro/tank over a ranger. You can think otherwise, and that's fine. Rangers are good for specific tasks, but really, they're generally not considered if you don't need a specific ranger build. That's all I'm saying. I like rangers and wish they are higher in the pecking order for professions in PvP. Anyway, it's late here and I can't tell if I'm coherent. Rangers rock, and should be used more often. Garrik Fel 09:06, 15 July 2007 (CEST)
 * HA is bad. It's maybe a little higher average skill level than AB. Also, HA's mechanics discourage using anything with a role that isn't keep red bars from going down, make red bars go up, kill stuff really fast, interrupt claim resource, snare stuff and do one or more of the things before this, or run relics and do one or more of the things before snaring. --Edru viransu 09:14, 15 July 2007 (CEST)
 * Lol, you ranked the professions. &mdash; Rapta  [[image:Rapta_Icon1.gif|19px]] (talk|contribs) 02:50, 30 July 2007 (CEST)