Build talk:Me/Mo 105hp Farmer

Approval?
So, is the current merge draft acceptable for everyone? What would you like to see adressed to further improve it? Does anyone oppose a merge entirely? --Krschkr (talk) 23:58, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I like it. However, it is different than any other page that I know of (format wise).  I am not sure what others would think. I like the idea of having one page for all of those low hp builds. I think it just looks cleaner.Mozo (talk) 18:07, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Sometimes a build calls for a different approach than most others. Another example of a largely deviant presentation is Build:A/E Perma Boss Farmer. So, from this point of view, being different from most pages formatting wise is not in itself an issue, as long as the presentation is good and adequate. But I'm not certain that this page already fills the good and adequate criterium... it's so vertical. Maybe we should try to present the content (through using tables?) more horizontally. --Krschkr (talk) 18:25, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Actually, I like the table method that was used in that Build:A/E Perma Boss Farmer build. Maybe that would look a little more condensed or "horizontal"? Mozo (talk) 18:29, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Mimicking the very same approach would probably look bad as the usage section on this page is more extensive. (Also in comparison to the original usage sections which usually were watch my video!) Hmm, I'll fiddle a bit with it. --Krschkr (talk) 18:32, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Maybe make the table just for the Farmable Areas section and for instructions, just list them separately below the table and link to them in the table? Just a thought.  Not sure if that would be better or worse.  Mozo (talk) 18:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Tried something. What do you think about it? I'm not sure how the build template code should be handled if we go for that approach. Due to the video embedding there's enough space to go for the large-scale Arbor Earthcall approach. Or do you prefer Bahnba Shockfoot's template or the old one just without headline, as seen everywhere below? --Krschkr (talk) 19:01, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I really like how it looks. Seems clean to me.  Mozo (talk) 00:30, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Which way should the skills in the farmable areas section be presented? --Krschkr (talk) 10:37, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I like the one for Arbor Earthcall better. Mozo (talk) 01:03, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Applied to all builds. I guess that's it and we're ready to drop the old pages. --Krschkr (talk) 10:09, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Interestingly applying this presentation to all builds had another positive side effect: On particularly narrow screens the skills will sort in two colums of four rather than two rows. This makes them more appealing and saves some space for the usage section. Right now I like that solution. --Krschkr (talk) 10:11, 29 June 2019 (UTC)


 * I like how it looks. What needs to be done to confirm the merge?  Do we need more opinions?  Mozo (talk) 19:11, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

We need consensus or lack of opposition, and it looks like we have both. I'll probably have to look up whether deleting the old pages (due to not having the required votes for an archival) is allowed or whether the page history needs to be preserved. Although, if necessary, deleted pages could simply be restored. Maybe it'd be the best solution to turn the old pages into redirects, even though I personally hate cluttering the build namespace with redirects. --Krschkr (talk) 19:48, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Is it possible to "archive" the pages here in the discussion? Maybe do that drop-down bar thing that is used for the variants and just copy paste all the info for each page into a respective drop-down? Not sure if this is allowed or how it would look.  It would preserve the info though if you can't archive.  Just a thought.  Mozo (talk) 21:46, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
 * It would be a tremendous waste of space and couldn't even preserve the edit history. I think it's going to be the redirect solution. --Krschkr (talk) 22:09, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Molotov Rocktail
Does this farm belong here? Or should it have its own page? https://youtu.be/0nvJk8GwQJ8 Mozo (talk) 17:42, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Imo this would fit into the page. --Krschkr (talk) 18:01, 5 April 2020 (UTC)