PvXwiki talk:You are valuable

Well, any objections to have a PvX policy to deal with these situations? We've got to start adopting our own policies sooner or later. - Krowman    07:52, 1 August 2007 (CEST)


 * Looks good to me.  —ǥȓɩηɔɧ 〚₮/ḉ〛 08:19, 1 August 2007 (CEST)


 * To deal with what situations? I'm not sure if this needs policy status, but it doesn't hurt. So: support. Should however not be made official before PvXwiki:Editing_and_Archiving_Discussion_Pages, otherwise it looks like this one regulates editing of posts on talk pages. –&thinsp;H HHIPPO  &lsaquo;sysop &rsaquo; 16:31, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
 * Yes, that was one of specific situations I intended this to deal with. The archiving policy was proposed after this one to deal with them in greater detail. - [[Image:Kowal.jpg|15px]] Krowman   19:17, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
 * Full support. Napalm Flame  ^_^ [[Image:Napalm_Flame_Sig_Image.JPG‎]] (talk)·(contributions) 19:18, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
 * Yay for new people! Leeroythefeared 01:05, 14 August 2007 (CEST)

"The PvXwiki community prides itself on its inclusive and accepting reputation.", "...but to ensure the cooperation and good spirit that this wiki is renowned for.". Wow, this policy must be ancient.  Ricky vantof  11:25, 5 January 2009 (EST)
 * This is a policy...oops. Good thing GW is dead and we need all the members we can get :D Karate Jesus  11:37, 5 January 2009 (EST)

ups
Is there really a point to having this policy around? ··· Danny   Does   Drugs  21:19, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * nope--Relyk 22:20, 28 May 2009 (UTC)