User:Lord Belar/Archive 1

You really need to cut dow--Shadowsin 18:07, 2 November 2007 (CET)n on the attitude. The way you've been treating Fire Tock in Build talk:E/R Staff Master is not the way you should act. Be less abrasive. Thank you, and welcome to the wiki.  —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ  〚 ₮ /ḉ〛 22:33, 19 August 2007 (CEST)

EDIT: Perhaps treating is the improper word, but your general attitude has been appalling.  —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ  〚 ₮ /ḉ〛 22:35, 19 August 2007 (CEST)


 * I agree, my comments last night were rather inappropriate. I have been trying to make more constructive comments, or to remove myself from that discusion. However, I feel that I am not the only contributor in that discussion that you should take issue with, as there are others that were equaly rude. Thank you for the reminder, I will attempt to be more polite in future discussions.--Lord Belar 22:54, 19 August 2007 (CEST)


 * Thx for adding points.[[Image:Zealous Benediction.jpg|19px]]  MasterOf Guild's  00:11, 5 October 2007 (CEST)

Redirects
I'd love to clean it up, but I don't know how, all those movements were pitiful attempts at getting the build into the trial section, I managed to realise how in the end but I can only apologise for the chaos left in it's wake, I'll try now to solve the issue.

Rating
Please may you re-read the variants before you shoot my build down? And also the discussion page if you would like to see the opinions on it. Thankyou. Foul Spook 20:21, 7 October 2007 (CEST)
 * I did read the variants and the talk page. That, unfortunately, will not stop it from being an inferior build. There are many problems with it as pointed out on the talk page, which you continue to ignore. Also, it has way too much self healing. This isn't RA, you will have a healer. Lord Belar 20:29, 7 October 2007 (CEST)	+
 * Okay, I see what you mean. Maybe this build would work better as solo or as a tank, but I'd appreciate you contributing your ideas. Foul Spook 20:53, 7 October 2007 (CEST)

I've re-assessed my build due to your comments and the views of the discussion page. Please feel free to share your views and comment on whether it is an improvement from the original design. :) Foul Spook 23:52, 8 October 2007 (CEST)

User Page
Why not make one? Just saying.--Victoryisyours (talk /pvxcontribs ) 23:18, 10 October 2007 (CEST)

Too lazy/not enough time. :D Lord Belar 23:24, 10 October 2007 (CEST)


 * Lol, just type. Hi, I'm Lord Belar, I dont know why you're here, but if you need anything just ask. Then say, My IGN is Your In Game Name. Then you could just add a userbox or two. I could do it for u if u really want lol =P--[[image:Victoryisyours_Sig_Image.jpg‎|19px]]Victoryisyours (talk /pvxcontribs ) 23:25, 10 October 2007 (CEST)


 * Lol, I was thinking I might work on it this weekend, it's fall break. Lord Belar 23:26, 10 October 2007 (CEST)

nothing in ur userpage ftw just look at mind :D §Ω☼Vorrax☼Ω§ 23:32, 10 October 2007 (CEST)


 * That's what my GW user page looks like. :) Lord Belar 23:33, 10 October 2007 (CEST)

so victory is ours just like your name says XD§Ω☼Vorrax☼Ω§ 23:34, 10 October 2007 (CEST)


 * -.-[[image:Victoryisyours_Sig_Image.jpg‎|19px]]Victoryisyours (talk _pvxcontribs ) 23:51, 12 October 2007 (CEST)

Lol I'm getting sick if your red link user page. If you don't write anything soon I'm gonna. =P.--Victory is yours 00:34, 17 October 2007 (CEST)

You could just make it redirect to your user talk page. —ǥrɩɳsɧ ƿoɲ  00:55, 17 October 2007 (CEST)

REDIRECT TO A PAGE THAT HAS A REDIRECT BACK TO YOUR USER PAGE. :DD --71.229.204.25 00:58, 17 October 2007 (CEST)

I don't like redirects. :D Lord Belar 01:11, 17 October 2007 (CEST)

Haha no more red link for you =P.--Victory is <font color="black" face="arial bold">yours 03:19, 17 October 2007 (CEST)


 * It's red again. Don't do sweeping changes to other people's userspaces without their consent. —ǥrɩɳsɧ  ƿoɲ  15:54, 17 October 2007 (CEST)


 * Lol. Lord Belar 22:48, 17 October 2007 (CEST)

how bout u make it a blank page its not a red link and theres nothing on there so we all win(especially me cuz i like blank pages :D ¼) <font color="228B22 ">§Ω☼Vorrax☼Ω§ 22:51, 17 October 2007 (CEST)


 * have one :D Lord Belar 23:28, 17 October 2007 (CEST)

It's just a redirect to his talk page...--<font color="darkorange" face="arial bold">Victory <font color="Brown" face="arial bold">is <font color="black" face="arial bold">yours 00:39, 18 October 2007 (CEST)


 * See above comments on redirects. :D Lord Belar 00:43, 18 October 2007 (CEST)

My userpage or lack thereof is in the top 50 most linked to pages! :D Lord Belar 05:21, 19 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Red link is annoying :P just type something like: poo or something and it's fine :D InfestedHydralisk  [[image:Shadow_Prison.jpg|19px]] 03:06, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Poo to you, too. :P Lord Belar 03:09, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Nah atleast I got a filled userpage >;) InfestedHydralisk  [[image:Shadow_Prison.jpg|19px]] 03:16, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Yeah, but my sig is a pretty red color. :D Lord Belar 03:21, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
 * And my sig has a pic :D InfestedHydralisk  [[image:Shadow_Prison.jpg|19px]] 03:25, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
 * And my sig has...um...well..nvm. :( Lord Belar 03:27, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Well, you could have said that your sig has 2 words :P InfestedHydralisk  [[image:Shadow_Prison.jpg|19px]] 03:28, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Yeah! Mine has one more word than yours! And it has the date and time! Lord Belar 03:30, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Mine has date and time too, but my word is 1 BIG word >:D InfestedHydralisk  [[image:Shadow_Prison.jpg|19px]] 04:13, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Yeah, well mine is ..um..BETTER! Just cause. :P Lord Belar 04:15, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
 * And uhh my name says that hydralisk is infested :D InfestedHydralisk  [[image:Shadow_Prison.jpg|19px]] 04:17, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
 * But mine is red! Lord Belar 04:19, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
 * And mine is black! InfestedHydralisk  [[image:Shadow_Prison.jpg|19px]] 04:24, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
 * But if you will excuse me, it's 4.25am, time to go to sleep ^^ InfestedHydralisk  [[image:Shadow_Prison.jpg|19px]] 04:27, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
 * I guess that means mine is better. :) Lord Belar 04:28, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
 * like a skill says "Never Give Up!" so I will never give up, you'll here more later ;) (or read whatever) InfestedHydralisk  [[image:Shadow_Prison.jpg|19px]] 04:31, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
 * I'm using "Never Surrender!" This could go on forever. Lord Belar 04:32, 22 October 2007 (CEST)

Make a user page! C'mon its fun! Joo lazy bum ^_^. Show us your character. wahahahah--Shadowsin 18:07, 2 November 2007 (CET)
 * Why should he? -.- - Rawrawr  18:11, 2 November 2007 (CET)
 * Why don't you show all your characters? ^_^ InfestedHydralisk  [[image:Shadow_Prison.jpg|19px]] 18:14, 2 November 2007 (CET)
 * I think Shadowsin has /failed on this one xd - Rawrawr  18:17, 2 November 2007 (CET)
 * Ahahah xD probably, but not what i ment by character. As in personality atributes those funny little This User loves TEa and thinks coffe sucks things. Do you really want me to show you my characters? o.O I will ^_^ they are ugly tho D: i have no good armor.--Shadowsin 18:36, 2 November 2007 (CET)
 * Oops didnt see the "User Page" Moving.--Shadowsin 18:39, 2 November 2007 (CET)

Act with some respect towards fellow people, would you?
Seriously. Why don't you go look at my contribs on GuildWiki? Then you can happily eat your foot, which will by then be lodged deeply within your throat. Somehow, I doubt you'd dare apologise for your lack of faith. - 68.97.132.83 03:12, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
 * I <B>am</B> checking your contribs, and that has absolutely no bearing on the quality of a build which you post here. You made a bunch of minor edits in the early days of GW, so what? You build can win in RA, my naked monk with frenzy and heal sig can do that too. It is not a good build, and it did not get vetted. Lord Belar 03:20, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
 * You see that "Abandoned" template this site has? The one that was on GuildWiki?  I have a pretty good large number of contributions, so it might take you awhile.  That's something I started on GuildWiki for the old builds section.  I did a lot of work for the wiki in the past (even if much of it wasn't on builds), if you recall one build that was fairly widely used in the past before it was nerfed, there was the W/Me Hydra Slayer build.  I pretty much championed Touch Rangers in RA for many months (prior to Factions, however - it was Touch of Agony/Vampiric Touch/Storm Chaser/Offering of Blood/Whirling Defense/Throw Dirt/Rez Sig/Troll Unguent usually, or subbed Throw Dirt for something else on occasion).  You underestimate me, and you belittle me.  This is annoying. - 68.97.132.83 03:31, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
 * 99% of your edits were minor edits. Anyways, that doesn't matter, this is PvX. Your build wasn't vetted, so you get over it and move on, rather than whine about it. Lord Belar 03:36, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
 * I have seven times the contributions on GuildWiki that you do here. You belittle me again by saying 99% are minor when that is a blatant lie.  A bit over half of those are marked minor edits.  Many of my edits marked minor don't simply involve changing a letter or a comma or something truly minor.  Even if you take out all of my minor contributions, I still have over three times the contributions that you have.  And yet you persist in acting such.  I don't wish ill of you, but I don't foresee a great future for you either, if you maintain such attitudes in life. - 68.97.132.83 03:45, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
 * You don't have more than 50 non-minor edits before mid March 06, and even then there aren't more than 50% non-minor. Also, you never seem to contribute on talk pages. Anyways, even if you wrote the entirety of GW, it doesn't make a difference in the quality of your build, so please stop insisting that it does. Lord Belar 03:52, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Guys, stop bickering, please. It's petty and pointless. --<font color="Black">Edru viransu //<font color="Red">QQ about me /sysop 03:48, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
 * I'm not going to continue this, however you are the one who initially brought up my contributions, Lord Belar. Don't say I'm the one insisting anything about them.  - 68.97.132.83 04:14, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
 * "Why don't you go look at my contribs on GuildWiki?" Anyways, on grinch's suggestion...

Lord Belar 04:17, 21 October 2007 (CEST)

That's actually the EXACT OPPOSITE of grinch's suggestion. Congratulations on your thinly veiled NPAs. Get a better attitude please--Thc 04:25, 22 October 2007 (CEST)


 * "I do believe that shut him up. Also, I think I'll go check his contribs on GW to confirm my guess about mending. :) Lord Belar 03:06, 21 October 2007 (CEST)" precedes "Why don't you go look at my contribs on GuildWiki? Then you can happily eat your foot, which will by then be lodged deeply within your throat.  Somehow, I doubt you'd dare apologise for your lack of faith. - 68.97.132.83 03:12, 21 October 2007 (CEST)" but I thought that was obvious.  Stop with your lying.  You're wrong, you refuse to admit that you're wrong about me, and then you label me as a troll for attempting to defend my build when nobody will even try it to see its consistency for winning.  Forget this site. - 68.97.132.83 10:34, 21 October 2007 (CEST)

(ri) Let's face it anon, Random Arenas is pure luck. 52 wins or whatever means NOTHING. AT ALL. PERIOD. We care about the build, not how successful you were with it. If the build sucks, users vote appropriately and to put it bluntly, your build sucked. This is fine, it's a part of the learning curve. I've made my fair share of poor builds too. Life goes on. Also, one more thing: PvX:OWN. —ǥrɩɳsɧ ƿoɲ  13:20, 21 October 2007 (CEST)

Ok thats all the 0-0-0's gone (ta auron), hopefully we can get some honest ratings now. &mdash; Skuld 13:35, 21 October 2007 (CEST)

Bored
[build prof=Me/R blood=-5 hammer=-150000 stre=-1000 prote=3e40 swor=200000000000 healing=-569837402 earth=-1 air=0+3+3+3+3+3+1 lead=1+1+5+3-2][mending touch][shock][lacerating chop][gash][axe twist][heavy blow][aftershock][ash blast][slippery ground][glowstone][oppressive gaze][mending][focused anger][/build] Lord Belar 02:34, 23 October 2007 (CEST)

[build prof=Me/Mo fas=-10000000000 smi=99999999999 swor=999999999999 str=-11525829859852 fir=72656576256 sha=-57287582176 healing=-999999999999999999+3+3+3-15258725][Meteor Shower][Signet of Judgment][Shadow Form][Glyph of Renewal][Mending][Orison of Healing][Heal Area][Sever Artery][Hammer Bash][Rodgorts Invocation][Resurrection Signet][/build] More bored... whoa, Healing turned out weird. :p <font color="Red">Viet talk  . 03:13, 23 October 2007 (CEST)


 * Mending gives over negative 200 quadrillion "regen" :D --[[Image:Wizardboy777_Sig.jpg|19px]]Wizardboy777 (T/C) 03:14, 23 October 2007 (CEST)
 * I know, even more 1337 than usual. :P Lord Belar 03:16, 23 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Kill yourself and your enemies with Heal Area? :D Maybe I should do Healing Ring instead :o [[Image:Hammer And Sickle.png|User:Viet|19px]]<font color="Red">Viet talk  . 03:19, 23 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Note that shadowform instantly heals you. :) Lord Belar 03:25, 23 October 2007 (CEST)
 * I'd insert some attr 23483427734578 offering of spirit. imba emanagement --Jim Eno 03:27, 23 October 2007 (CEST)
 * I'm thinking -blood and cultists for emanegement, personally. :D Lord Belar 03:28, 23 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Heh, I like the OoS icon moar. I think it's a pretty valid point :P :P --Jim Eno 03:29, 23 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Yeah, but my way you can save 7e on all spells <B>and</B> kill yourself!! Lord Belar 03:31, 23 October 2007 (CEST)
 * reset indent - and that'd be the icing on the cake! approved, less oos, moar that skill i dont remember the name! --Jim Eno 03:32, 23 October 2007 (CEST)
 * This is what I'm talking about. :) Lord Belar 03:34, 23 October 2007 (CEST)
 * -70 blood would do it. Lord Belar 03:35, 23 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Now i want a private GW server to have -70 blood QQ --Jim Eno 03:37, 23 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Shadow Form is the best. It heals you ~50 trillion seconds before you even think about it. (More indents, dood) [[Image:Hammer And Sickle.png|User:Viet|19px]]<font color="Red">Viet talk  . 03:38, 23 October 2007 (CEST)
 * (EC)Lol, just get on the dev servers. Lord Belar 03:38, 23 October 2007 (CEST)
 * HAX! I'M RIGHT NOW IN THE D3V SERVZORZ EOE BOMBING CHARRZORZ! --Jim Eno 03:42, 23 October 2007 (CEST)
 * ZOMGZ! /reports! --[[Image:Wizardboy777_Sig.jpg|19px]]Wizardboy777 (T/C) 03:42, 23 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Lol. Did anyone else notice that a 130 derv or a 55 monk pwns that xD.--Shadowsin 06:59, 3 November 2007 (CET)

Why should i listen to you?

 * I put it up for vetting BY MISTAKE i copy pasted the wrong tag. IM NEW GIMME A BREAK! I wanted to get peoples opinions on the build. NOT FLAMES! thats all i get from people on my first build up here. so mind your own please :D--Shadowsin 03:25, 23 October 2007 (CEST)
 * <= My bad.--Shadowsin 03:26, 23 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Please read PvX:NPA, PvX:OWN, PvX:SIGN and most importantly PvX:VETTING. Lord Belar 03:10, 23 October 2007 (CEST)

Hey...I'm the author of the build, and I found that Clumsiness works better than Wastrel's Worry, which is why I changed it. I'm changing it to Clumsiness again, please don't revert it again. &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sumaelin (contribs).
 * Sorry, I didn't know. Lord Belar 02:52, 25 October 2007 (CEST)

Mantis Redone
I wasnt vandalizing, I was trying something, Besides that was in the "Testing" Category and it has 5 down votes so I moved it to the trash...... >.> so why is it now in the "Trial"?--Shadowsin 01:36, 28 October 2007 (CEST)

Hai!
Hai there mangleD (T/C ) 22:19, 29 October 2007 (CET)

HB wammo? o.o'
whats that? o.o'?--Shadowsin 06:53, 3 November 2007 (CET)
 * HB = either Hundred Blades or Hero Battles. Most likely Hundred Blades. Wammo = W/Mo. So basicly, the godly the Invoke Ragequit build. --Teh Uber Pwnzer  07:00, 3 November 2007 (CET)
 * Actually, in this case I meant Healing Breeze, but he had 100 blades too. Lord Belar 21:02, 4 November 2007 (CET)