User talk:ShmEk8763

/wave. -- -Chaos- (talk) -- 10:32, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
 * Love the telegram there - rofl - total truth!-- -shmE k  (talk) 10:56, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
 * It's called a template, and I had to tune it down a "little" because it used to be way too offensive :> But thank you ^^ -- -Chaos- (talk) -- 12:35, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
 * It wasn't offensive, it was just plain retarded.  Thomas   So   Dutch  11:29, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
 * That too. -- -Chaos- (talk) -- 11:34, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
 * The "wtf?" thingy was bad. -- -Chaos- (talk) -- 11:35, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
 * Heh - can you send me a link to the old just plain offensive and bad one if it's still around? Just want to see what history I missed out on.--  -shmE k  ( talk ) 15:07, November 25, 2009 (UTC)

SIGNATURE
It needs work. If you haven't clicked on Watchlist (top right on page) then you haven't read this. This Blue word is a link and you can click on it to take you to the page where we are talking about your sig. X 11:21, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
 * Personally, I think the font on your X looks worse than his sig :o Don't know if he uses some font I can't see. -- -Chaos- (talk) -- 11:33, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
 * ty for the comments I've been working on it and thought I had finally fixed it how I wanted but not sure. It should look like -shmE(in black)k (in grey)with a row of grey dots under it.  "talk" should be in black and linked now as well, which took a long while to get to what I thought was working after checking it.  Btw: I did read your reference page prior to your message :) (now..sig check)--  -shmE k  ( talk ) 15:02, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
 * well crap, looks like I copied back one of the sigs i was working on and not the final product :/ so here goes again.... another check-- -shmE k  ( talk ) 15:02, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
 * This one appears to be working right as I had wanted. If it's looking funny to most users (I don't have any special fonts going other then stock XP on my machine) I'd appreciate hearing about it.  I was content with no sig until I started dorking around with it.--  -shmE k  ( talk ) 15:07, November 25, 2009 (UTC)

Sig Issue Question:
Any of you that have commented here know how some people are able to get more letters into the sig preference box then it seems to allow? I'm looking and keep having it cut off what I was actually first trying to do, and yet I see people with more characters then can be fit in from my experience.-- -shmE k  ( talk ) 15:12, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
 * What quite a few people do is make a signature page (like mine) and type into the preferences box. Make sure you have the 'subst:'. Otherwise you make your sig an easy vandalism target. Toraen TheJanitor [[image:ToraenSig2.png]] 15:50, 25 November 2009 (UTC)