User talk:Crossfirexiv/Myth: PvX Fails

Usually here on PvX, people recieve trash ratings because they dont follow a "format" For example an assassin build is 0-0-0ed because there is no IAS, or a Derv build is 0-0-0 because there is no 3/4 attack.

So, basically you're complaining about us requiring the one thing that makes the build functional in PvP? --71.229 20:00, 3 April 2008 (EDT)


 * Im trying to prove that because a build is missing somthing, people 0-0-0 it when it doesnt really deserve to be 0-0-0ed. Say Archive:A/D Grenth's Grasp Assassin Didnt have Whirling Charge, people would 0-0-0 it even though it doesnt make a huge difference.--X [[Image:Crossfire Godlysig.png|19px]] 14  20:02, 3 April 2008 (EDT)
 * o i c. --71.229 20:06, 3 April 2008 (EDT)

Panic wins
Everyone go home. --71.229 04:15, 4 April 2008 (EDT)

"People believe that PvX is a falure for a number of reasons and these are why" Yep, it fails pretty hard.  ɟoʇuɐʌ ʎʞɔıɹ  04:24, 4 April 2008 (EDT)

PVX DEFINITELY FAILS HARD
Alright listen to this. Archive:E/Rt Splinter Shackles was rated GREAT for there were 8 votes claiming it good. User:Skadid9090 erased all the good votes (about all 8) and Now its in TRASH. MY POINT..... BM's CONTROL ALL BUILDS ON THIS SITE. BASICLY THE COMMUNITY HAS NO SAY IN ANYTHING. ITS THE BMS THAT CONTROL ALL.--X 14  07:32, 6 April 2008 (EDT)


 * This why they are BMs, they are BMs for a reason and thats their jobI guess. -- Super Igor  07:36, 6 April 2008 (EDT)
 * There's a not-word in the English language that gives me nightmares. It's "mediocracy".  Rule of the perfectly average.  It's late and I'm tired, so just mentally insert a logical and well-reasoned argument about why mediocracies are bad and why you should stop trying to turn PvX into more of one than it already is. --71.229 07:51, 6 April 2008 (EDT)