User talk:Mahmoud ahmadinejad

Ratings on Archive:W/any Cleave PvE Soldier's Stance Warrior, and Archive:W/any Triple Chop PvE Warrior
Please reconsider your 0-0-0 votes, I don't see mending or flare on any of them... Tycn 10:46, 8 September 2007 (CEST)

Archive:W/Mo Full Vigor Paladin also. I don't know what you have against warriors, but please revoke your rampage of crap votes immediately. Tycn 10:51, 8 September 2007 (CEST)

Those builds are all worthless. Why should I go "easy" on builds that aren't any good? Am I supposed to stop and give a +1 to innovation for using an elite nobody uses on a warrior because it's a bad elite for a warrior to begin with? If I hated warriors, I would give those builds good votes because I actually do not know how to play warriors (e.g. "wow my warrior heroes use this build great! i have no idea how to play warriors so i think this works good 555") I like warriors, and anyone else that does (and has a brain) wouldn't use any of those builds, ever. Mahmoud ahmadinejad 11:01, 8 September 2007 (CEST)

The point is, they're not worth a 0-0-0. That's reserved for builds that DO NOT contribute to a party at all, doesn't deal any damage and totally fails. Votes should be scaled according to how effective they are, not just given 5-5-5 or 0-0-0. The old buildwiki was like that, and failed. Tycn 11:06, 8 September 2007 (CEST)

Okay then, going by your rating system I have re-evaluated my votes. Mahmoud ahmadinejad 11:12, 8 September 2007 (CEST)

Thanks, those votes are a lot more reasonable. Tycn 11:15, 8 September 2007 (CEST)