Archive talk:Me/E SoI Frag Ganker

AB? I'd rather run a Fast Casting nuker which has far better capping capabilities. I think this should stick in GvG.  ɟoʇuɐʌ ʎʞɔıɹ  20:13, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
 * Probably, someone just added an AB tag to the A/N guy so I figured I should add one here too. Zuranthium 20:15, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
 * This isn't suitable in AB, imo.  ɟoʇuɐʌ ʎʞɔıɹ [[Image:Panic_srsbsns.gif|37px]] 20:19, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
 * I mean, compared to other Me(/E) builds.  ɟoʇuɐʌ ʎʞɔıɹ [[Image:Panic_srsbsns.gif|37px]] 20:21, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
 * Yes, I understand your meaning. Just depends on what you want to do in AB. Some people would rather run around and kill the opponents, letting other allies focus more on the NPCs. A team with this character could certainly be good at that. *shrug* Zuranthium 20:32, 7 May 2008 (EDT)


 * 1) Reject dozens of builds based on the same concept.
 * 2) Moderately famous player posts a marginally better version.
 * 3) ZOMJ 5-5-5
 * 4) Creators of the dozens of other builds complain.
 * 5) "lol meta shift go 'way."
 * mirite? --71.229 20:24, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
 * Most SoI builds were like "lolol elementalist build wif fast casting hurfdurf" while this actually has a purpose and it works.  ɟoʇuɐʌ ʎʞɔıɹ [[Image:Panic_srsbsns.gif|37px]] 20:26, 7 May 2008 (EDT)


 * mostly. except the part where this is meant to be paired with that A/N.  Which your list also applies to, funnily enough.  Just remove the AB tags or have them both on the same page and people won't QQ. --[[Image:Mafaraxas_sig.jpg|click moar]] Mafaraxas  21:01, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

This is so bad alone. &mdash;  Ska K  id  20:29, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
 * Not really. It can still kill NPCs at a decent rate by itself. Of course you have to consider builds in their correct setting, so...Zuranthium 20:46, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
 * I hurd somein' cool goes on wif teh metas. -- Super Igor  20:39, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
 * idk how this would should be rated.on its own its not good.with the sin it is.--[[Image:Rebirth Infidel.jpg|21px]] aesthetic
 * Yeah, note about Archive:A/N Deadly Virulence--Relyk 11:13, 8 May 2008 (EDT)
 * i think they should be combined tbh.--[[Image:Rebirth Infidel.jpg|21px]] aesthetic

This character doesn't need to be run specifically with a Virulence Sin to be useful. Nor does the Virulence Sin need to be run with this exact Frag Mesmer. Have some creativity and think of your own configurations. Zuranthium 11:31, 9 May 2008 (EDT)
 * but what im trying to say is this alone is decent and virulence sin alone is decent, but together there goodness.--[[Image:Rebirth Infidel.jpg|21px]] aesthetic


 * This isn't fragging. Fragging was using something like Mark of Rodgort and Flare along with Fragility so that you would constantly re-apply Burning while still triggering Fragility. --[[image:GoD Sig3.jpg|20px]] Guild of  Deals  18:41, 10 May 2008 (EDT)
 * Found that one in my sandbox :D

[build prof=Me/E ill=11+1+1 fire=9 ins=9+1 air=5 fast=2+1][glyph of energy][gale][fragility][mark of rodgort][flare][accumulated pain][ether feast][resurrection signet][/build] --Relyk 02:00, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
 * hmm 9+1 magic? :P Joethenoob 17:12, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
 * Mine was better, cept some noob welled it cause it uses flare. [[Image:mightymouse.gif|25px]] moush 17:29, 19 May 2008 (EDT)
 * That flare thing sucks balls lol. Also i recomend shell shock over deep freeze or nightmare for a varient. The cracked armor adds an additional 40dmg plus the skills 50dmg, plus the cracked armor for the rest of the spike adds another 200+ dmg.I Heal If U Shutup 23:24, 31 May 2008 (EDT)

Backfire?
Armor of Mist was much better, good defense and anti-kite, bad move imo. / Fros  T  alk  \ 14:48, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Both have their uses, but Backfire makes things die. It's amazing at VoD. Zuranthium 00:11, 7 June 2008 (EDT)

Remove A/B Tag
This simply isn't great in AB. If you run it as part of a team it could be but alone it's simply not efficient compared to other builds you could be running in AB. Sure it can kill on its own, but A LOT slower than many other builds. 122.104.165.13 04:32, 9 August 2008 (EDT)