Archive talk:W/A Steady Stance Axe Warrior

How about malicious strike? That could work here... frvwfr2  (talk···contributions) 16:04, 9 June 2007 (CEST)

Omigawa Notes
Steady stance wars are unfavored by the elitist guild wars community because they don't do a single thing well. They do low damage, their pressure is random and often not helpful. The watch yourself! Will help a team much more than this one if you were hell-bent on playing a steady stancer.. --Omigawa 19:10, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
 * And you are wrong, these things will knock your teeth out :).
 * These are amazing... omigawa, show us a build you created that you think is good, when you get unblocked. [[Image:User Frvwfr2 signature.jpg|User:Frvwfr2]] frvwfr2  (talk · contributions) 16:51, 14 June 2007 (EDT)

Checked and Reviewed
For Viability. Readem (talk *pvxcontribs ) 16:47, 14 June 2007 (EDT)

fear me
in my opinion fear me doesn't work very well unless you're fighting a lot of warriors. the problem i see is many other characters have lots of energy and it's not very possible to spam fear me enough to drain a ton of energy. i like to replace it with shield bash if i'm up with a lot of sins. i would replace it with another adren attack skill. at least with steady stance you charge them up pretty quick. or maybe rush. 75.35.76.199 04:24, 18 June 2007 (EDT)

No Fear Me is good... Them wasting 4 energy every 6 secs is good... It's 1 more spell they can't cast. It basically negates even caster's energy regen. frvwfr2  (talk · contributions) 04:30, 18 June 2007 (EDT)

Okay, here's the math on negation...
 * Caster's regen is 4 energy per 3 seconds, which equals 8/6... Fear me! can usually be used every 6 seconds, as SS recharge is 6. so, it is then 4/6, or 2/3. You cut a caster's regen to that of a warrior. [[Image:User Frvwfr2 signature.jpg|User:Frvwfr2]] frvwfr2  (talk · contributions) 22:51, 9 July 2007 (CEST)

People usually run 2 or 3. Readem (talk *pvxcontribs ) 22:57, 9 July 2007 (CEST)

Well, that's just the math for one, so they are REAL effective. frvwfr2  (talk · contributions) 22:59, 9 July 2007 (CEST)

But the scythe version is much better, the meta and everyone else in Guild Wars seems to agree.


 * That's mostly just because scythes are seriously imba. --Edru viransu //QQ about me 01:26, 1 August 2007 (CEST)

The linked scythe version seems to no longer exist. --InternetLOL 01:46, 20 September 2007 (CEST)
 * Lies! — Skakid9090 01:52, 20 September 2007 (CEST)
 * i c wut u did ther. --InternetLOL 01:54, 20 September 2007 (CEST)