User talk:Ganks2379

Notice
Please do not comment to me here about any build. You will tick me off. This is not the appropriate place for build discussion. --Ganks 00:10, 19 August 2007 (CEST)
 * Actually, it is. Napalm Flame  ^_^ [[Image:Napalm_Flame_Sig_Image.JPG‎]] (talk)·(contributions) 01:08, 19 August 2007 (CEST)

Never, ever remove anyone's comments on a talk page. This is a buildwiki, we criticize your builds, if you can't handle that, I'm nicely advising you to leave before you become a pest. Saying that a skill sucks is not trolling, it's commenting. &mdash; Skakid9090 21:46, 18 August 2007 (CEST)

Saying a skill sucks it not trolling, because vapor blade does suck. A good team will keep enchantments up such as Aegis, Prot Spirit and various other monk enchantments, and the damage is only mediocre anyways for the energy cost. You would be better off just arcane echoing shatterstone. Napalm Flame  ^_^ (talk)·(contributions) 23:06, 18 August 2007 (CEST)
 * What are you trying to get at? You're a little late in the discussion. It's already over. Duh? --Ganks 00:06, 19 August 2007 (CEST)
 * I was notified about the discussion. And besides, I was just getting my point across, after all, that's what you are SUPPOSED to do on a wiki, am I right? It's all about free speech.


 * What I am getting at is that your spike is quite pathetic, and yet you are trying to make it seem like you own this wiki and want to make all the rules. Guess what. Life doesn't work like that. Napalm Flame  ^_^ [[Image:Napalm_Flame_Sig_Image.JPG‎]] (talk)·(contributions) 01:09, 19 August 2007 (CEST)


 * less fighting. &mdash; Skakid9090 01:12, 19 August 2007 (CEST)
 * Don't worry, I'm not, skakid... YET. Napalm Flame  ^_^ [[Image:Napalm_Flame_Sig_Image.JPG‎]] (talk)·(contributions) 14:54, 19 August 2007 (CEST)
 * Sorry, but you are. Though that's fine. You're welcome to fight. But, I'm sorry... considering the rating of the build I would say your -opinions- are far off. You are still welcome to them. The spike deals 350 damage in under 3 seconds. It's about the same with Gust and IS. Your opinions are as baseless as that other guy's though I'll admit that his had a bit more substance and he turned out to be right. You ... are just saying it sucks. Oh well. Have fun arguing with yourself because Im not arguing over this build anymore. Any further trolling will be formally ignored.--Ganks 04:43, 24 August 2007 (CEST)
 * What did you just do to the build, Napalm? Do you -really- intend to abuse your power? We've been through this already. Are you really sure you want to pick that sort of fight with me? I already told you unless you are going to ban me you will not win. lol --Ganks 04:52, 24 August 2007 (CEST)
 * Napalm can't ban. He has no administrative powers (as far as I know.)  ‽ -(єяøהħ)  no u 04:56, 24 August 2007 (CEST)
 * And what build are you talking about? ‽ -(єяøהħ)  no u 04:58, 24 August 2007 (CEST)