Archive talk:W/R Symbolic Warrior

I can't decide between a W/R w/ Antidote Signet and a W/Me with Signet of Distraction or the like. Any thoughts? 85.71.168.42 11:01, 13 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Optional and let them decide for themselves? God  box    11:02, 13 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Maybe... but then what would the title be? Build:W/Me or R Symbolic Warrior? 85.71.168.42 11:06, 13 June 2008 (EDT)

Have it W/R and have antidote Signet. It can then run as a ganker in GvG, and has good survivality for RA. Had a test of this, as i was gonna post this exact samebuild until i had a search of the builds. HAs relli good dps. Have hit for over 100+ on symbolic on most uses of it. Zuko 07:26, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

What's the idea of symbolic with only 3 signets. It deals +36dmg, which is just as much as Executioner's Strike's bonus dmg. &not; Master Gladius  09:10, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Yea, for half to adrenal cost! / Fros  T  alk  \ 09:10, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
 * But you have to wait for Evisc. anyways. Run Cleave with it I say... Isn't Dismember 5adr?  09:15, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

Then you should you something to go with it like dismember. There you've got a cleave build with better dmg and no elite. Just thinking what could be the best choice for the elite. &not; Master Gladius  09:16, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Dismember->CLeave->Symbolic. And put Poison Tip Sig as an option.  09:18, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Cleave and Symbolic does seem a bit tasty. / Fros  T  alk  \ 09:20, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
 * 5Adr spike, similar to Evisc. Less Utility, as no DChop, but similar pure damage.  09:21, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
 * If you replace Eviscerate with Dismember... what do you take out to make room for an elite...? 85.71.168.42 09:22, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
 * You'd have to drop Bulls, which would be a killer... But still, I would put it in testing.  09:37, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Take cleave, to answer your question / Fros  T  alk  \ 09:40, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
 * I like my free 100 damage DW No 09:40, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
 * What? You mean Evisc?  09:42, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Yeah pretty much Evisc > Cleave No 09:44, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
 * It gimps the bar less and bulls is almost necessary No 09:44, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
 * (EC)Not when the rest of your chain charges in 5 hits. But yeah, in general. THis build would be more for pressure than Evisc would.  09:45, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Take Evisc and then an interrupt such as Distracting Strike, Disrupting Chop, etc, IMO. --Guild of Deals * Wah Wah  Wah! * 09:47, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Eviscerate + Bulls > Cleave + Dismember (at least for what I was intending). 85.71.168.42 10:45, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

Merge
They're identical builds, one of which was created before the other. Why/what are we merging exactly? 85.71.168.42 10:46, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

To all dismember people
This is good the way it is. If you're gonna wait till evis is pumped, ur doing it wrong. You can simply spam symbolic strike without eviscerate anyway; cuz it's +dmg, and +dmg is pressure. Just do evis + symbolic the next time it will be charged, as evis will be charged around that time anyway. —ǘŋ Ɛxɩsƫ  13:52, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
 * You're such a euro. &mdash; Rapta  [[image:Rapta_Icon1.gif|19px]] (talk|contribs) 13:54, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
 * <3 --[[Image:Ibreaktoilets_Signature.jpg|User:Ibreaktoilets|20px]]Tab  Moo  13:54, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Stfu you wanna-be euro. At least I euro 4 real. —ǘŋ  Ɛxɩsƫ  13:56, 15 June 2008 (EDT)

Er
Why Sprint instead of Rush? -- Armond Warblade 17:24, 19 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Splitters need rush, since they need an IMS to get to stuff, Rush needs adrenaline, so, yea Sprint / Fros  T  alk  \ 17:28, 19 June 2008 (EDT)
 * Oh. Duh. Ok. -- Armond Warblade[[Image:Armond sig image.png]] 17:41, 19 June 2008 (EDT)

delete
was never meta, its bad. Gringo 01:54, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

added a well tag
we can leave the elite optional on the other and list primal and eviscerate, but i think keeping primal is just better, but if anyone cares we can add evis. Gringo 02:44, December 14, 2009 (UTC)