Archive talk:Me/E MoR Warder

I don't know, this is already in the variants of the Me/Mo. Tycn 14:17, 4 October 2007 (CEST)

How are the attribs? --Edru viransu //QQ about me /sysop 14:20, 4 October 2007 (CEST)

I'd go with the current setup. MoR makes it more than maintainable anyway. Tycn 14:22, 4 October 2007 (CEST)

How is this? --Edru viransu //QQ about me /sysop 02:59, 5 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Pdrain in for either res sig or pleak. GoLE isn't *that* good for energy. - Auron
 * What attributes? --Edru viransu //QQ about me /sysop 03:07, 5 October 2007 (CEST)
 * 11/10/9/7, all with minors (except for the 7 earth). I might be off by a number, not logged in gw atm. It hurts the mor, but meh; if its really that big an issue, drop dom a bit more. - Auron 03:29, 5 October 2007 (CEST)

This really isn't different enough to qualify having a seperate page imo from Me/Mo. Besides, like Tycn said, this is already in the variants for the Me/Mo version. --Mafaraxas 01:10, 6 October 2007 (CEST)

............................................________ ....................................,.-‘”...................``~., .............................,.-”...................................“-., .........................,/...............................................”:, .....................,?......................................................\, .................../...........................................................,} ................./......................................................,:`^`..} .............../...................................................,:”........./ ..............?.....__.........................................:`.........../ ............./__.(.....“~-,_..............................,:`........../ .........../(_....”~,_........“~,_....................,:`........_/ ..........{.._$;_......”=,_.......“-,_.......,.-~-,},.~”;/....} ...........((.....*~_.......”=-._......“;,,./`..../”............../ ...,,,___.\`~,......“~.,....................`.....}............../ ............(....`=-,,.......`........................(......;_,,-” ............/.`~,......`-...............................\....../\ .............\`~.*-,.....................................|,./.....\,__ ,,_..........}.>-._\...................................|..............`=~-, .....`=~-,_\_......`\,.................................\ ...................`=~-,,.\,...............................\ ................................`:,,...........................`\..............__ .....................................`=-,...................,%`>--==`` ........................................_\..........._,-%.......`\ ...................................,<`.._|_,-&``................`\ @ Mafaraxas —ǥrɩɳsɧ  ƿoɲ  01:14, 6 October 2007 (CEST)
 * What's that? emo-head? Sorry I don't know your inside joke. Yes, this has a fairly different function than Me/Mo, but it's in the variants of that build. --Mafaraxas 02:00, 6 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Different function != dupe, no? --Edru viransu //QQ about me /sysop 02:02, 6 October 2007 (CEST)
 * It's a facepalm. He's saying you're being stupid. --71.229.204.25 02:08, 6 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Indeed. I could keep arguing, but meh, it'll just go in circles and your opinion is the one that matters. On the picture, you can't blame me if a detailed ASCII picture is misinterpreted. To me, it looks like someone is pushing the hair out of their bowed head.  Er... that was me seeing the image with the face on the right side. anyways. --Mafaraxas 02:13, 6 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Wow... myself last October. wow. -- Mafaraxas  ( talk  &bull;  contribs ) 14:19, 9 June 2008 (EDT)

Um, Eloc, why vote 0 universality if it works well? --Edru viransu //QQ about me /sysop 04:21, 6 October 2007 (CEST)


 * It should be removed. Additionally, to those users shouting "omg, dupe!", this varient is common enough to warrant its own page. &mdash; Rapta  [[image:Rapta_Icon1.gif|19px]] (talk|contribs) 04:43, 6 October 2007 (CEST)

Nerfed...
Archive? --Mala 23:57, 15 October 2007 (CEST)
 * i concur. [[Image:Frenzy.jpg|50x19px]]Punjab 23:59, 15 October 2007 (CEST)


 * I don't. This is a skill balance week/weekend. When it's over and if the nerf stays, you can cry archive. —ǥrɩɳsɧ  ƿoɲ  00:22, 16 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Mmkay, good point. --Mala[[Image:Mala_sig_Mind_Blast.jpg|19px]] 00:27, 16 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Which nerf? If the MoR nerf doesn't stick, it won't be too bad, because even nerfed WaM only costs 5 energy much of the time. --Edru viransu //QQ about me /sysop 00:34, 16 October 2007 (CEST)
 * It's more than usable, and still good. But I'll probably be running e-surge in light of the update. Tycn 15:17, 16 October 2007 (CEST)
 * I was thinking the combination of them both. --Mala[[Image:Mala_sig_Mind_Blast.jpg|19px]] 17:51, 16 October 2007 (CEST)
 * Esurge is just better, 33% recharge isn't worth it anymore. - [[Image:Unexist sig.jpg|20px]]Unexist  08:57, 22 December 2007 (EST)

Come back?
WaM recharge nerf could make this viable. -- Guild of  Deals  20:25, 7 March 2008 (EST)
 * Why? The recharge only got longer... Didn't it? Rickyvantof 20:27, 7 March 2008 (EST)
 * MoR would cut it back down to 20 seconds. --[[image:GoD Sig3.jpg|20px]] Guild of  Deals  20:29, 7 March 2008 (EST)
 * So, GoR > this face, you mean? —ǘŋ  Ɛxɩsƫ  08:57, 9 June 2008 (EDT)


 * Can't skillessly Diversion spam anymore, it's not worth it. &mdash;  Skadiddly [슴Mc슴] Diddles  20:29, 7 March 2008 (EST)