PvXwiki talk:Equal Rank Voting

Voting on this policy
Favored. I agree with this policy, and believe it should be implemented.
 * 1) (Your Vote Here)

Unfavored. I dislike this policy, and believe it should not be implemented.
 * 1)  Exactly what happened at Guildwiki. Good-bye policy, I hope I never see you again. Ever.Cheese Slaya 02:29, 10 May 2007 (CEST)
 * Much as I agree with your vote, there's no voting until the 12th (see the Main Page). I'm striking the entire section because according to PvXwiki:Voting on Vetting Policy, we only get yes votes. -- Armond Warblade[[Image:Armond sig image.png]] 20:29, 10 May 2007 (CEST)

"This is a proposed vetting policy to replace PvXwiki:Build vetting procedure." How is this any different than the current build vetting procedure? - Auron 16:27, 2 May 2007 (CEST)
 * It's not, I guess. Cardinal said that no votes count on any of the vetting policies at the moment, and no added votes will count until five vetting policies are in existence. Even then, they wouldn't count unless the voter had voted on all five of them. See PvXwiki talk: Percentage Favored Vetting. 21:13, 2 May 2007 (CEST)
 * While you're on that page, tack an official vote under Defiant's comment in that same section (I did something similar right under his comment). 21:16, 2 May 2007 (CEST)
 * Shouldn't there be an official, easy to spot Voting section on each proposal's talk page? I wouldn't expect too many users to read all the discussions. Or maybe a combined section on PvXwiki_talk:Community_Portal? Anyway, I don't understand how to vote. Is it that everybody has one vote and decides to favor one proposal or should everybody vote yes/no on each proposal? In the latter case: Can you vote yes on more than one? --Hhhippo 22:55, 2 May 2007 (CEST)
 * Each user will be given 1 vote. He can place it on any policy he likes. One vote, regardless of rank or number of policy. If you don’t want this one to be in vote delete it or extend so it can enter competition. GCardinal 06:40, 3 May 2007 (CEST)

I just made this so that we would only need 1 more policy... Lol, I know it has no chance... Edit is as you see fit. --frvwfr2 (talk)(contributions) 21:22, 2 May 2007 (CEST)

Archive
Please archive this discussion, start with discussing on how to improve this policy. Around may 8-9 or 10 vote will start, discussion we be deleted and only vote's without never ending discussion will go here. So I suggest you use that time to make you candidate stronger. GCardinal 06:41, 3 May 2007 (CEST)