PvXwiki:Requests for adminship/Tycn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

Tycn (talk &bull; contribs)

 * User:Tycn was made into a sysop on October 22, 2007.

Active, intelligent, mature, coolheaded. — Skakid9090 02:53, 2 October 2007 (CEST)
 * I'm honoured by the nomination, but I'll have to decline. I feel that we already have a strong admin base, and the work that I do on the wiki wouldn't really benefit from being an admin. Tycn 02:59, 2 October 2007 (CEST)


 * With the loss of Readem, I feel that the site would benefit from another active admin. Tycn 09:47, 22 October 2007 (CEST)

Support

 * 1) One of the more active contributors. Also puts alot of time into trying to help improve the wiki. [[Image:Ibreaktoilets_Signature.jpg|User:Ibreaktoilets]]Ibreaktoilets  09:55, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
 * 2) As Ibreaktoilets said above, plus I like the guy. - (snō hwīt tăn)   [sic]  14:58, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
 * 3) tycn r iQ - Rawrawr  15:34, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
 * 4) &mdash; Rapta  [[image:Rapta_Icon1.gif|19px]] (talk|contribs) 22:16, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
 * 5) Active, helpful with positive contributions to the wiki, and besides that he is a cool guy. Grats on the nomination.P C Gamer 22:30, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
 * 6) Tycn's reason for accepting the nomination really says it all, what we need at the moment is a high level of activity and dedication. [[Image:Defiant Elements Sig Test 2.JPG|50x19px]]  *Defiant Elements*   +talk  22:38, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
 * 7) Absolutely! Rusty The Mesmer 22:44, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
 * 8) I agree 100%, with Eronth inactive, Readem demoted, we really need another active knowledgable admin present.--[[image:Victoryisyours_Sig_Image.jpg‎|19px]]Victory is yours 22:47, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
 * 9) This guy know the way of the moooooo. Fish is  baed  22:51, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
 * 10) As per Rawr's vote. - Auron 22:54, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
 * 11) Absolutely. —ǥrɩɳsɧ  ƿoɲ  23:03, 22 October 2007 (CEST)

Oppose

 * 1) (your vote here)

Neutral

 * 1) (your vote here)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.