Build talk:D/any General Vow of Silence Farmer

On a second thought I'm not sure if merging these is the right idea. With boss farm pages it makes more sense since they share a common theme and tailoring a part of the bar to the encounter is easy to do since these farms take a minure or two usually. Merging FoW, UW and dungeon farmer builds into one, each with their own lengthy routes and tactics with 3-5 skills that can change could make this page a bit too convoluted. It'd be similar to merging the HA, RA, and JQ Word of Healing bars except much worse. And that's just the harder farms, there are about a dozen others a VoS bar could farm. Maybe it'd be better not to merge them, and keep this new page for all the other areas a VoS bar can farm. --DefinitelyNotHanz (talk) 14:01, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I think that it's worth to keep trying to make this happen. It's a draft, we can experiment with it. What do you think about collapsed tables for the very lengthy farms I added in the last change? --Krschkr (talk) 10:17, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Definitely better than it used to be. I'll work in it a bit more when I have more time later this week and see how it turns out. --DefinitelyNotHanz (talk) 14:45, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I'd argue that counters, notes and videos is more useful if they belong to each seperate farm instead of 1 combined counters, notes and videos for every farm. It looks pretty good atm btw ZStepmother (talk) 15:40, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I think that at least counters should be a general section. If one of them shows up in a farming location, utility skills are picked accordingly to make the farm work nonetheless and the usage instructs users how to deal with the counter. Or, if the counters are too hard in a certain area, players know that they won't have much success with trying the farming build over there. Especially if the collapsed table approach is taken for the specific farming areas moving videos into the respective area section probably wouldn't hurt, just help to keep things that belong together in one place. (And they could be tucked to the right since we're already within table formatting.) No opinion about notes yet – let's first see what they'll be. --Krschkr (talk) 15:41, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Removed the notes section until somebody comes up with any to add. See also features the escape ranger because it does the same thing as this build, just against pure physical groups. Videos from the current pages have been added. What else could we improve? Some more uniformity in the farming locations section would be good, but I personally already prefer the merge proposal over the existing pages. --Krschkr (talk) 01:47, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * So there are no further ideas for immediate improvement. Does anyone oppose the merge? --Krschkr (talk) 23:09, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Build:D/any Focus of Hanaku Farm
Any special reason why the merge draft isn't targeting this page? --Krschkr (talk) 15:42, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Added it to the list. --Krschkr (talk) 00:02, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Move to "Great"
This page has 2 votes now, no reason it is in testing. I moved it to Great, it should've been there from the start anyway ZStepmother (talk) 10:30, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Putting this into testing until it received the required votes was the right thing to do, it shouldn't have been in a different category from the start. The exercise of changing the real-vetting tag once the required amount of votes is reached or a vote changes the build category is within the responsibility of the user who submitted the decisive vote – in this case that was you anyway. --Krschkr (talk) 01:39, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * It was a combination of several builds which were already well known, tested and rated builds (except for the Diessa one, which was in testing for some reason), so yeah, it should've been in Great. ZStepmother (talk) 17:17, 11 January 2020 (UTC)