User talk:ZStepmother/A/any

Optionals
Protector's strike does the same as magehunter's strike (except for dealing 5 damage less) and should be added as a non-elite variant. Also, brawling headbutt deserves more emphasis: Other than a hammer knock down you can get three renewing smashes in without earthbind if your 33% IAS is active, noticeably improving your performance. Backbreaker on the other hand should be dropped because of the strength requirement, it's unreliable. --Krschkr (talk) 01:28, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Build namespace
I'd like to transfer some of these builds to the build namespace, but I'm not really sure how to approach it. They are all variants of the same idea, and all share like half of the bar. The difference is in the power level. Scythe is really strong, and so is the hammer, axe is also decent. Bow and spear are not great, but it's not like they are terrible either. Still, it would be unfair to give the shared page a bad/great rating, because of bow&spear. Do I just make seperate pages for each type then, even tho they are all very similar builds? These builds definitely deserve to be there, they are not at the level of dagger spam, but they are still very effective (at least, some of them) ZStepmother (talk) 09:44, 3 May 2020 (UTC)


 * 1) A/D Scythe is already vetted for players at Build:A/D Wounding Strike. Hero build was archived: Archive:A/D Hero Critscythe.
 * 2) A/W Axe is really strong, I ran the bar below for years through pretty much everything. I'm amazed there's nothing similar vetted. I'd endorse vetting one of these.
 * 3) A/W Hammer - workable, but isn't  great with Earthshaker?
 * 4) A/R Bow - we've archived similar builds per Archive:A/R Critical Barrage Assassin.
 * 5) A/P Spear - not interested.


 * - Chieftain Alex (talk) 10:18, 3 May 2020 (UTC)