PvXwiki talk:Vetting VI.

No offense, but it's almost as though you took all the bad qualities from all the other build policies and lumped them together to create this one. - Krowman  (talk • contribs) 07:21, 9 May 2007 (CEST)
 * Yes I am being offensive, this policy sucks to the worst degree possible. Readem (talk *contribs ) 07:27, 9 May 2007 (CEST)
 * ...you are confusing me...should I be offensive in my reply or not..? Well, its not my style, but then there is nothing to reply to.--Vazze 08:29, 9 May 2007 (CEST)

I agree with Krowman. This policy is seriously flawed. Encourages elitism, the ranks would be too hard to keep track of for every user, four categories for the builds to fall in in terms of their rankings are too few. And do the 5 before O, the 6-10 before E and the 11-50 before A mean that there will be only 5 builds above 75% and only 50 builds kept and not deleted in total? Seriously, this is just a mess. &mdash; Hyperion` // talk 16:03, 9 May 2007 (CEST)

Quality control
Please make sure that this policy has all things required to pass quality control. Please read PvXwiki:Voting on Vetting Policy.

IMPORTANT!
Make sure that your policy meets all of above requirements or it will NOT become a candidate and people will NOT vote for it.
 * How new builds will be posted.
 * How new builds will get into actual vetting procedure. (short)
 * How discussion and voting/vetting will be done.
 * How re-voting will be done. (short)
 * How deletion of builds will be done. (short)
 * How builds will be organized. (optional)
 * How it will affect existing builds. (short)
 * If policy needs mediawiki extension, who will make it? (short)
 * Plan on how to make a script (if needed).

GCardinal 22:02, 10 May 2007 (CEST)