PvXwiki:Requests for adminship/Blastedt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

Blastedt (talk &bull; contribs)
An overall awesome person! Blastedt 02:45, 20 June 2007 (EDT)

'''Request for adminship closed by Auron on 10:35, 23 July 2007 (CEST). Nomination failed.'''


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
 * I accept. Duh. Blastedt 02:46, 20 June 2007 (EDT)

Support

 * 1) Go go gadget Blastedt! --Dirigible 11:25, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
 * 2) (your vote here)

Oppose

 * 1) Just jumping on the bandwagon isn't a good enough reason... -- Armond Warblade[[Image:Armond sig image.png]]  07:48, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
 * 2) Need moar cow-bell. Readem  (talk *pvxcontribs ) 07:53, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
 * 3) blastedJ is better - Skakid9090 08:42, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
 * 4) Agreed with User:Armond, needs more of a reason than wagons of banding.  ‽-(єяøηħ)  no u 17:10, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
 * 5) If ever there was a "why not" nomination, it is this one.  There's no reason, compelling or otherwise, that substantiates this nomination.  [[Image:DE Sig Test 2.jpg|50x19px]]  *Defiant Elements*   +talk  16:25, 22 June 2007 (EDT)
 * 6) Immature. 86.83.15.245 01:44, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
 * 7) I think part of what brought ruin to the original GuildWiki's build section was the negative attitude perpetuated by Blastedt & some others.  Definitely opposed. 64.230.98.144 03:33, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
 * ...What? Blastedt 07:14, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
 * 1) O_o... um.... who the hell nominated this guy... oh, he nominated himself, that says everything... (just look at his user page.... he's tryin ta break things)--Midnight08 15:51, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
 * 2) Just... no.  Napalm Flame  ^_^ [[Image:Napalm_Flame_Sig_Image.JPG‎]] (talk)·(contributions) 03:00, 6 July 2007 (CEST)
 * 3) whoru? --Edru viransu //QQ about me  08:09, 23 July 2007 (CEST)
 * 4) who? and nominated self--Coloneh 08:33, 23 July 2007 (CEST)
 * 5) (your vote here)

Neutral

 * 1) He is honest, however I switched my vote, as he just made the most arrogant comment... I'd hate to see what he would do if he were a admin Sneakysmith12 04:32, 3 July 2007 (CEST)
 * 2) (your vote here)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.