User talk:Emilepeters

That should have been a new page, not a move of an existing one. -- Toraen   confer  08:37, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Please continue editing your new build at this name. I will be moving and reverting the old build. -- Toraen   confer  08:41, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

CALM THE FUCK DOWN AND USE MINOR EDIT JESUS WHAT THE FUCK. Thank you for your time. 19:27, 15 November 2012 (UTC) http://wiki.guildwars.com/images/e/ea/User_Ezekial_Riddle_Show_Preview.jpg
 * 86.186.88.133 21:34, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

randomly trashing all the SoO builds you didn't submit is also pretty weak. Cɥıǝɟʇɐıu Alǝx 18:01, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * ^You seem to be voting builds down because people aren't using them properly, even though they are known to work well with a competent team. Player failure can be taken into account for PUGs, but a trash vote is far overdoing it and you seem to be highly biased since you've posted a SoO build. If anything, propose an archive for outdated builds (although if they provide a niche for more professions to do SoO, they might stay regardless). -- Toraen   confer  19:05, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I'd just like to point out that literally no one on the gw community uses this site anymore unless they are new players. The SC builds especially. Any SC player still remaining in the game has their own builds that they will play with their guildies. Simply posting a SoO rangerway isn't going to change the meta.-- Ultimak719 LIKE A BOSS!  21:59, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

hmm nobody on the GW community uses this site anymore? :D that is realy sad to hear nobody want to see this great site. don`t you want see a change in that? see people improve there skills and knowledge about speed clears? (BTW lots people tink and say they know everyting in game,~very sadly i have see that a lot. PVX wikia might open a world for that people and help them from that disorder) alredy people starting Rangerway teams, or asking to join. but sad ting is lots don`t know wel what builds are best for it PVX wikia builds could help them A lot)) specialy when they can find the team set up eazy on front page^
 * as previously noted, this is not wikia - scroll down to the bottom of the page and you'll see its curse (also currently no advertising nor oppressive company reps!). Also anything related to gw1 is dead online. Cɥıǝɟʇɐıu Alǝx  08:08, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

blablabla i can`t read or write i know can`t make this site intresting for people to look for? even now guild wars is kind of death. or is realy al hope given up? why not post Rangerway or any other updated teambuilds for speedclear on front page? if simple google for build auto you end up this site. i just don`t believe realy nobody is willing to look it up egain.

copy pass from front page> Welcome to PvXwiki, the largest database of Guild Wars character builds!

Dear Editor
Your recent edits meet my standards. Congratulations. 16:32, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Editor
Tank you. And i am sory about my misunderstanding about it. Emile

Frostmaw aura way
Hi, I'm gonna revert the last few edits you did to ashway, tag it for archival, and put your edits on a new page. (totally different build and different name =! same build :) ) - Chieftain Alex 20:31, 16 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Hmm not sure what you meen... as you must have noticed I am prety big noob on this site, and don`t know realy how to handle stuff here, but I wil do my best same for my bad English written.


 * no worries, to everyone else it will look exactly the same as it did before. :) - Chieftain Alex 21:33, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Chiming in to say I've moved it to Build:Team - Frostmaw Auraway for consistency with our other -way builds. -- Toraen   confer  02:57, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Just to be sure that you know, your new build is at that location now. Again, please do not overwrite existing builds to create new ones. You can copy the content of an existing page onto a new one if you need the formatting of a previous build to guide you. -- Toraen   confer  04:41, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Sorry again for overwrite an existing team build. That was not my intention. I just can't figure how to post a build, the way it suppose to be done. I am not a real computer hero here. But tanks for help.

Deleting your comments
Is against the pvx policy PvX:Archive. Reverting a revert is against the policy 1RV. Stop trying to get banned please. 17:53, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * ^I don't think a ban is warranted at all here, but please go over our policies since you seem to be unfamiliar with some of them. The New User Guide may be helpful for an overview of the more important policies. -- Toraen   confer  20:59, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Oke thanks ley me know. Sory for the inconveniences.--likepax (talk) 01:00, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Moving pages
Please untick the "Leave a redirect behind" button when moving pages to new titles. - Chieftain Alex 11:14, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Build:Team - Bogroots Auraway
This seems to be the 4th time that you've moved and overwrote an existing build instead of making a new page. There are a couple ways to start a new page:
 * Modify the URL to point to where you want the new page. For example, http://gwpvx.gamepedia.com/User_talk:Emilepeters is the page we are currently on. You can replace User_talk:Emilepeters with your build name, so this would be the result: http://gwpvx.gamepedia.com/Build:Team - My Team Name
 * Create a link to where you want the build on an existing page (your user page or the Sandbox is good for this). Simply add a link to the page with Build:Team_-_My_Team_Name . Click on the link after previewing or saving the edit and you'll be at the blank page for your new build.
 * Type your desired build name (including Build:) into the search box. You will find if a build is already at the name, and if not, a message at the top of the results page gives you the option to create a page at that name.

Hopefully this will not happen again, and I'll be adding this to the New User Guide since it seems to lack this info (and the Help:Contents page doesn't go into much detail either...). -- Toraen   confer  07:46, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Oke tank you, ill do my best next time adding it the way you just showed me. Sorry again for inconveniences.--likepax (talk) 08:34, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Ohw fuck me~ stil no clue how to post a build.. kind of screwed your trial page for solo running build in PVE. really tried to do it in the way you explain me above but not worked out.--likepax (talk) 17:35, 30 July 2013 (UTC) Seems I fixed it~ but still no clue how the fuck you can post a build without overwrite an existing one.--likepax (talk) 17:52, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I have no idea how you managed to do all that instead of what you wanted to, but it should be all fixed. Try . Before anyone complains about capitalisation, the name needs work anyway. A new misery  17:58, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

I have made a page for solo Shards of Orr ass well and noticed that it's on the same page as where the D/A solo kath build is^. The only point is that the links are posted at the general trial build page, wile they should be at the Running Trial page. I can't figure how to change that, sorry for that.--likepax (talk) 16:45, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Wieners. [[Image:They.jpg|36px|link=User:Raskles]] 01:08, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * At the top of the page there is a tag, . I tagged the builds for general PvE because I had no idea what they were. If you want them to be in the running section you should tag your builds with  .  A new misery  09:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

yes, what a misery.

God is dead. Nietzsche is dead. And I do not feel so good either.--likepax (talk) 15:17, 5 August 2013 (UTC) Woody Allen actually...
 * Down comes the house of cards. Are you german or polish? [[Image:They.jpg|36px|link=User:Raskles]] 01:30, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

none of that, I am from Netherlands--likepax (talk) 10:10, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

That took me long to figure, shame on me.~--likepax (talk) 10:27, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * No worries. Phen still thinks you're kawaii <3 [[Image:They.jpg|36px|link=User:Raskles]] 12:40, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Please indent responses
It makes conversations between users easier to read on a wiki talk page. -- Toraen  wiki  18:52, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Long Time no See
Just letting you know that a few builds you were the primary contributor for have been moved to the abandoned category. If you feel that you'd like to keep any of them but don't want to bother with them in the mainspace, feel free to move them to your userspace where they will be safe forever. Any that don't receive significant edits within 2-4 weeks (depending on my activity) will be deleted if they are still in the Build: namespace. You can find the builds here if you've forgotten where they are. -- Toraen  wiki  03:13, 13 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Agree that you moved the Slavers mixed spike team set up, and the solo kath build for the dervish.

working builds, but nobody who want to play that. Sad story to see the game die. only strange you also moved the BoGSC Auraway page and solo Shards of Orr. The solo dervish build for Shards of Orr realy is working great, way better than the A/Me build with Visage. not very long ago they even posted pictures for the record page http://gwscr.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=270 where was used a simulair build as the one i posted here on PVX wiki. i did many solo runs in SoO my self also, and can say the Aura build works way better than the A/Me visage build.


 * Also a bit weird you move the BoGSC Auraway page. Since BoGSC Auraway and manly way are prety much the only 2 ways, people organize runs for that dungeon.

Spearway is way slower, and harder for people to make it alive to Kabhuus. Its extinct for prety long time. You should know that, if you pay a visit to Vlox Falls ones a wile, and watch what runs people organize.


 * You move 2 great build pages that people actually still play, wile the folowing "great working builds" stil are in that section>> FrostmawSC Ashway, RragarSC splitway and RragarSC manly spike, SoO Dervishway. Realy non ever played that builds in the pass 4 years. They are lame, retard and outdated. --likepax (talk) 13:57, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Er, I'm not active in-game. I'm just helping maintain the wiki. If builds get left in trial they'll fall to abandoned status. This isn't irreversible, just keep editing them (you can revert the tags yourself). Change the build tags to testing if you don't want them to fall to abandoned, or at this point just move them to a tested category after voting on them. I only moved the builds to abandoned because it looked like you gave up on them (no edits in about a year, not yet moved even to testing). I'm not a SCer and never have been, so I don't know which builds people are still running. If you know the meta (such as is left in the game) be bold and edit. Archive old builds if you'd like. This page has the details on how to do that. -- Toraen  wiki  14:17, 14 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Wel i voted my own builds in the abandoned builds section, but i have no clue how to get them to the testing section.
 * Actualy: BoGSC Auraway belongs in the great working builds section for speed clears, and the solo SoO dervish build in great working builds "the running section".

FrostmawSC Ashway, RragarSC splitway and RragarSC manly spike, SoOSC Dervishway should go to the abandoned section. Its a bit shameful that those builds stil are in great working section. What is special on the RragarSC splitway could easely be combined in the RragarSC stormway.
 * But i did not post that team setup, so i would never interfere with someone else his team builds.
 * I am willing to post a new RragarSC manly way team setup, that is way more updated and suite to the way, that people play RragarSC manly way.--likepax (talk) 13:50, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Is it time to archive the whole site and do away with vetting yet? At the moment Pax is practically the only active user. Does that mean we should give him free reign to great vet builds? Otherwise, no new builds will pass vetting. I don't want to just lock the main space because people do some useful things like update fluxes, but jesus, this site is dead. Even if people are allowed to keep it up to date, it won't be kept up to date. A new misery  17:29, 15 July 2014 (UTC)


 * There are still a lot people that play Guild Wars. Also people that just discovered the game and start play it. Specialy for the speed clear gamers, this site is the best help for people to offer. There should be a direct link from some N.P.C. in the game to this site! ~

As long the Guild wars servers are running and people stil active play the game, it is worthwhile to keep this site profesional and up to date with the actual game play "is my opinion". I can't help hoping that A/Net put theire shoulders under Guild Wars 1, and start make it alive egain. They made lots mestakes they could learn from. giving up the fight too easy, is one of theire mestakes.--likepax (talk) 14:55, 16 July 2014 (UTC)


 * How do you propose to keep this site up to date with an active user base consisting of 2-4 people, most of whom do not even play the game? I am open to suggestions. Certainly our current policy of requiring 5 votes to get through testing is inappropriate. A new misery  17:06, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I thought people were already ignoring the 5 vote requirement (like, 2 votes or something on some builds) when I originally left. Policy probably should have actually changed if that was the case, but I'm not surprised there was no effort to do so. I don't expect this site to ever be on the cutting edge of the meta (such as it is) anymore, but if even one user wants to post the SC builds people use, awesome. PvX remains useful to the game. The problem is that right now, our dungeon SC content is pretty much paxwiki with no oversight or other contributors to check/polish this stuff. I was thinking of lowering the editing lock to see if anyone is interested at all (not likely since no one was jumping in to replace leaving users before the lock), but I'm not sure I'd be willing (or even have the time) to revert a flood of spam should that result. I might be able to limit editing to just registered Curse users, so I'll look into doing that. -- Toraen  wiki  04:49, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Also, likepax, I've moved the two builds you wanted out of abandoned into testing. -- Toraen  wiki  04:57, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

first of al, thanks a lot for help with repost the builds to the testing section. I think limit editing to just registered Curse users, is a great idea to give it a fair chance to get some experienced game members who would give a meaningful vote to a build post. I hope that lowering editing locks is not going to give inconveniences. I understand the isue about the voting pard, and feel uncomfortable if i stay the only person that would have control on what builds go to the great working section. On other hand, i am having great fun in helping and charing my opinion about builds that are posted. About FrostmawSC Ashway, RragarSC splitway and RragarSC manly spike, SoOSC Dervishway to the abandoned section; i am very sure that everyone that play spead clear and hangs around in Vlox falls a lot, would agree on me that those builds make no sence anymore. Specialy cause they are in great working section. When people doing Frostmaw, its solo with Assasssin or Ranger and when they do it with a team, they do it Auraway. RragarSC they only do stormway or with a Assassin tank and gater, and VoS dervish to spike (manly way). SoOSC Dervishway is totaly extinct after Rangerway got introdused in Vlox Falls. There is a Dervishway team setup witch is able to make the same fast runs as rangerway can do. I have posted some of those builds before but got a bit strange respons. Understandable because the builds are a bit hard to understand and play, especially for the more inexperienced speed clear gamers. But if some person show up with a Dervish for SoOSC and ping a build that is showed in the great working section, he really make a complete fool out of himself. But i understand if you want keep the site as it is. since those builds 3 years ago truly where great working and most people did not know better ways to do Speed Clears.--likepax (talk) 14:53, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * For now, I've put archive pending tags on the builds you've said are outdated, with a link to the newer build that you've said replaces it on each one. That will hopefully do for now. If more SC editors come in after the changes to the lock, we can get some more feedback to fully archive the outdated builds. -- Toraen  wiki  04:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh god, what have we done. A new misery  20:13, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

I Know What i did wrong, and again i am very sorry..

i tryed to figure how to post that build the way it supposed to be done, but failed. Just have no clue how it works I am sorry. But as i promised the updated version of RragarSC manly, i have posted on top of that weird outdated RragarSC manly way. It probably have to be removed to the trial section first in order to follow the guide lines. If you can figure how to do that, Thanks a lot. you could leave it in the great working build section, but thats up to you. I can assure you that these builds are great working, and not make this site look unprofessional.--likepax (talk) 14:13, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for help, moving the build in to the testing pard--likepax (talk) 19:14, 15 August 2014 (UTC)