PvXwiki talk:Elitism

Thoughts? -- Jebus  contests  16:50, 20 November 2008 (EST)
 * you're so bad. -- Jebus  contests  16:51, 20 November 2008 (EST)
 * waaahhhh now im emotionally domagesed. -- Jebus  contests  16:51, 20 November 2008 (EST)
 * I'm an example ='(--[[Image:DZbleh.jpg]] Liger414  talk  16:51, 20 November 2008 (EST)

A policy can't stop this, you're out of your freaking mind. Victoryisyours (talk /pvxcontribs ) 16:52, 20 November 2008 (EST)
 * Policies dont stop NPA, but its there. -- Jebus  contests  16:53, 20 November 2008 (EST)
 * But policies allow people to be banned by it, banning people for elitism is...=S--[[Image:DZbleh.jpg]] Liger414  talk  16:54, 20 November 2008 (EST)
 * It's a good idea but I think the borderlines are too fuzzy, ie "You're violating PvX:Elitism," "No, I'm just making a joke," etc etc - Mc Tai [[Image:Tai_Sig_Image_3.png]] 16:55, 20 November 2008  

You would have a point if elitism was a bad thing. --Ojamo  (>.<( O=(- -Q)  16:56, 20 November 2008 (EST)


 * BM's are elitists, so we should throw this policy at them and ban them when they say the truth, despite how blunt it is? [[Image:ViYsig5.jpg|19px]]Victoryisyours (talk /pvxcontribs ) 16:56, 20 November 2008 (EST)
 * were not was lern2gramar.-- reason ' . ' decrystallized   I frenzy-healsig.  19:58, 1 December 2008 (EST)

The problem is most of the time bad builds are posted, by bad people, and you cannot explain in terms that they will understand why the build is bad, so you simply have to say, "this is bad". And tbh if someone that I know is blatently better says something I said/did/posted is bad, I will take it in the light that it is simply correct, and bad. No elitists means overrun wiki full of shit builds. -- Frosty  16:57, 20 November 2008 (EST)
 * Elitists are like condoms, controlling the population, but in this case builds not people.--[[Image:DZbleh.jpg]] Liger414  talk  16:59, 20 November 2008 (EST)

Some people are just better at GW than others. They have a right to make that fact clear to other members of the PVX community. Also Liger, that was not funny, try again next time, thanks.  ɟoʇuɐʌ ʎʞɔıɹ  16:59, 20 November 2008 (EST)
 * Yeah I fail...--[[Image:DZbleh.jpg]] Liger414  talk  17:00, 20 November 2008 (EST)

I hope you realize the original point of PvX was to improve the quality of Guild Wars. Obviously this has probably had the "opposite" effect, but a policy like this just basically destroys the principle. Basically saying "No, shut the fuck up I'm better than you" is incredibly stupid. Joke policies are well, jokes. -- <small style="font-variant:small-caps;font-family:Verdana;border-style:solid;border-width:2px;border-color:red;background-color:gold;padding:0px 5px 1px 6px;"> Guild  of   Deals   17:29, 20 November 2008 (EST)
 * Terrible policy is terrible. - Misery  Is  Friendly  [[image:Misery Dog obaby.gif|19px]] 17:42, 20 November 2008 (EST)

None of you opinions matter, but I don't like this policy.--<font color="Black">Simpson Man  17:45, 20 November 2008 (EST)

I grant that maybe we could be nicer about it, but ...
sometimes a build really is just crap, and usually it's crap that we've all seen twenty times before. when you're vetting down yet another Life Siphon swordsman, constructive criticism seems a little empty.-- reason '''.  decrystallized '  I frenzy-healsig. '' 20:02, 1 December 2008 (EST)
 * And the people that post the life siphon swords usually dont want to hear it anyway. --<font color="Purple">Ojamo  <font color="Green">(>.<( O=(- -Q)  20:17, 1 December 2008 (EST)