PvXwiki:Requests for adminship/Sneakysmith12


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

Sneakysmith12 (talk &bull; contribs)

 * Request for adminship closed by Auron on 10:32, 23 July 2007 (CEST). Nomination failed.

I would be incredibly honest as well as encourage creativity where ever I could. Sneakysmith12 23:24, 16 June 2007 (EDT)

As further information about myself, I was not planning on contributions such as new articles, more of background work such as article deletion, script making etc. --Sneakysmith12 01:39, 18 June 2007 (EDT)


 * I accept this nomination --Sneakysmith12 06:39, 19 June 2007 (EDT)

Support

 * 1) (your vote here)

Oppose

 * 1) Readem  (talk *pvxcontribs ) 14:01, 17 June 2007 (EDT)
 * 2) Not an active contributor. - Skakid9090 14:42, 17 June 2007 (EDT)
 * 3) Inactive on the wiki. - [[Image:User Frvwfr2 signature.jpg|User:Frvwfr2]] frvwfr2  (talk · contributions) 05:18, 18 June 2007 (EDT)
 * 4) This brings up around 40 contributions in the time space of June (none in April or May whatsoever) with around half of them around your Ravenous Spiker build and the others in various talk pages. Unfortunately, that is not what I consider enough for a potential Administrator. -- Nova  [[Image:Jirouji-Nova.jpg]] --  (contribs) 08:13, 18 June 2007 (EDT)
 * 5) I have to agree with Nova. -- Armond Warblade[[Image:Armond sig image.png]] 16:28, 18 June 2007 (EDT)
 * 6) Basically inactive till just now.  ‽-(єяøηħ)  no u 17:14, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
 * 7) Who? &mdash; Abedeus  [[Image:User Abedeus Sig.jpg|19px]] 03:13, 21 June 2007 (EDT)
 * 8) Shows minimal knowledge of builds outside of PvE, and PvE builds the user has been seen working with are not the best either. Sorry, but it's a no from me. &mdash; Rapta  [[image:Rapta_Icon1.gif|19px]] (talk|contribs) 17:06, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
 * 9) For me it isn't about build knowlege but their mode of thinking and their behavior patterns. I do not see a neutral contributor or a comunity based contributor.  He seems to be trying to figure out his perspective on GW than how to promote a perspective onto the wiki.  Shireen  sysop  17:31, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
 * 10) Innactive, and nominated himself.--Coloneh 08:25, 23 July 2007 (CEST)
 * 11) (your vote here)

Neutral

 * 1) (your vote here)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.