User talk:Forbiddenbludge

Haiiiiiiiiii Blush :D :D Am stealing your talk page's virginity...thanks!--Blue Screen Of Doom  11:35, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Yoooo, thanks for stopping by ;p  now try stuff out in harder areas/dungeons, see you in-game! Blush Farseer 22:37, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Your sig needs to reflect your user name and not use an external link. Use a regular wikilink to provide a route to your user/talk pages. -- Toraen TheJanitor [[image:ToraenSig2.png|link=User:Toraen]] 00:15, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Blushway
Read PvX:OWN. Blushway also says literally nothing about the contents of the build.  —ǥrɩɳsɧƴ ɖɩđđɭɘş   02:47, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Welcome to PvX.  —ǥrɩɳsɧƴ ɖɩđđɭɘş  [[Image:Grinshpon blinky cake.gif|19px]] 02:47, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Cool story. Well according to the naming convention in the build naming policy page the pages about builds need to accurately reflect the contects of the build, eg Build:W/E Crippling Slash Warrior. If it's a team build, similar thing but with Team in front of it, eg 'Build:Team - GvG Balanced' - except balanced doesn't say anything about what the team is. For example, 'racway', 'physway', 'frostway' (connects to using Winter and mantra of frost only), 'ashway', 'platoon doa', 'manly spike', 'dlway', 'terraway', 'ubway', 'sabway' and for that matter anything ending in Way which originated from a build someone named after himself. The only exception is when a build is commonly known as something else by the Guild Wars community (such as Build:Team - Sabway and Build:P/W Imbagon). I would like to submit that you are a complete douchebag (quote: 'Also, blushway is a stupid name.'), and would like you to either revert the pages to what they were before you changed them or rename all the other pages in pvx ending in 'way'. Whatever the case, it would have been nice for you to post on my discussion page and ask me to come up with something more appropriate, instead of naming them something shit and deleting the originals before discussing (yes i read the OWN page).
 * PS: your name is stupid.
 * PPS: you're at least the 4th admin to look through all this content, and yet the first to act in such a way. so either the other 3 so far have been not doing what they're supposed to do so far - or you are indeed, a douchebag.
 * Hi, before you call someone a douchebag, you should first make sure you aren't one yourself. Blushway is a fucking retarded name and most admins cbf to change the name of a build that is going to be deleted anyways. Also don't be a policy whore.-- Relyk  talk  04:08, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Since you seem to be pitching a fit on this subject, I'll humor this. Most of the above builds you've mentioned with names not directly analogous to their function reflect the name that they earned in game, through whatever means, and therefore became utterly inseparable from these names. This is one of the only exceptions to Pvx:NAME; those of the above that apply to this convention are Racway, Platoon DoA, Manyspike, DlWay, and Sabway - the rest clearly apply to their function, i.e. terraway using a large abundance of Earth Magic for survival, etc.
 * In addition to any inane attempt I might make to invoke PvX:NPA, I might also suggest that, if you'd like to continue making constructive contributions here, I'd not think that posting imprudent walls-of-text on ever established member's talks whenever they provide feedback would be an apt recourse.
 * tl;dr: get off your high, damn horse. Aonsephonie 04:10, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * @ Relyk, i wouldn't have been so rude (as you can see from just about any other post i've ever done) if the admin in question had not been so deliberately rude first. So simply put, the unnecessary things he said seem to clearly be more than 'hi, i'm respectfully changing builds i know you are involved in so they adhere to pvx rules'. 'Blushway is a fucking retarded name'? that's your opinion - i didn't even come up with the name, plenty others I know think it's fine, and instead of promoting a somewhat friendly and constructive atmosphere you sound like a childish flamer. 2nd last comment - are you suggesting that my builds will just be deleted anyway? Nice constructive feedback buddy, it's great to see you testing other peoples builds before rating them. Don't be a policy whore? what do you even mean by this - i'm pointing out inconsistencies i see across the PvX site, aren't the policies there for such a reason?
 * @ Aonsephonie, I'm not pitching a fit, I just saw no point in replying politely to him, if it's a legitimate change I'm happy to leave it as it is or pull it out and dump the builds back in my userspace. I'm aware that things like sabway and such earned their name in the game before proceeding to the PvX site, as i also noted that i had read the part about exceptions. I still don't see why the site admins remain inconsistent with various other names other than the really common ones though - or why it's such a big deal in the first place since it barely takes a moment to open up a 'Xway' page and see what it's about, besides categories already give half the answers (is it a team build, hero build, etc).
 * To be completely frank and honest with you, I really appreciate that you bothered posting, I really appreciate your politeness and thanks for the suggestion but considering what so many other posters are like on this site I might just start avoiding it altogether, I doubt people will notice or mind. As for walls of text - uh, it's a bad chat tool i'm not used to?
 * Forbiddenbludge 04:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * blinky cake is watching you. --184.153.31.65 06:05, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Aonsephonie hit the nail on the head. The only exceptions to PvX:OWN and PvX:NAME are things that have been grandfathered into the name. Sab created sabway on guildwarsguru, it became e-famous as sabway, and it was called sabway. Your discord with a splash of fire team is original content. Make up a clever name if you want, but it has to describe the build in some way. These aren't difficult ideas to grasp and they've been made into policies for blatantly obvious reasons. If you want to debate the merits of the policies, do so on their talk page. If you want to argue policies and their various semantics or the spirit of these policies, you'll have a very difficult time with me. I wrote most of them.  —ǥrɩɳsɧƴ ɖɩđđɭɘş  [[Image:Grinshpon blinky cake.gif|19px]] 15:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC)