User talk:Bluemilkman/Mini-Games Vetting

Why make a minigames page? Let the builds spread by word of mouth and recentchanges. And as they're not being "vetted" per se, you might want to rename the policy... -- Armond Warblade 02:32, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

Why not? Playing guild wars is not always about who has the best build to do this or that. Sometimes people want to take a break from the game and play, you guessed it, a game for the fun. To help people who may not be as creative as others, a Mini-games space would be helpful. That's the point of this wiki, isn't it? To be helpful to those people looking for builds. I am leaving the vetting part there, as it is a vetting process. The rating vote would still be on it. The good games will be "tested" and approved. The bad ones would not pass and be deleted or moved back into userspace. Bluemilkman 16:29, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
 * So play the mini-games ANet put in GW for you. EotN will have a bunch more than just the festival games; by the time this policy goes through enough discussion, it wil already have been released. People will come to PvX Builds because they are looking for builds anyways, not because they are after the best way to imitate Dodgeball in GW. - [[Image:Kowal.jpg|15px]] Krowman   16:34, 25 June 2007 (EDT)


 * You say they would go back to the userspace... I don't see any reason for them to leave it in the first place. There are plenty of fun things to fool around with in most of the game - glitches, minor bugs, or just plain cool places to do stuff - but guildwiki doesn't mention any of them. Leave it in the userspace. -- Armond Warblade[[Image:Armond sig image.png]] 10:27, 28 June 2007 (EDT)

The point of this to make it easier to find them, by having them all in the same place. If you guys don't want it in the build namespace, fine. I'll just make a list in my userspace, I don't care. I was just trying to see who was for it and who was against it. Obviously, nobody that liked it said anything. Bluemilkman 12:22, 28 June 2007 (EDT)