PvXwiki talk:Requests for adminship/Blastedt

Just jumping on the bandwagon isn't a good enough reason... -- Armond Warblade 07:48, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
 * Yes it is. Blastedt 09:18, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
 * Prove to me you have the skills and abilities necessary to do the job then. -- Armond Warblade[[Image:Armond sig image.png]] 03:27, 21 June 2007 (EDT)
 * I can be blunt! :) Blastedt 14:35, 22 June 2007 (EDT)
 * >_<. You are killing yourself, mate. ‽-(єяøηħ)  no u 14:39, 22 June 2007 (EDT)
 * I can be blunt too. There's absolutely no reason that I see that this RfA should exist. -- Armond Warblade[[Image:Armond sig image.png]] 05:37, 26 June 2007 (EDT)


 * Well, I'm awesome!Blastedt 10:11, 26 June 2007 (EDT)

Need moar cow-bell. Readem (talk *pvxcontribs ) 07:53, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
 * Will fix. Blastedt 09:18, 20 June 2007 (EDT)

blastedJ is better - Skakid9090 08:42, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
 * Is not. Blastedt 09:18, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
 * is too! - Skakid9090

64.230.98.144's comment
I think part of what brought ruin to the original GuildWiki's build section was the negative attitude perpetuated by Blastedt & some others. Definitely opposed. 64.230.98.144 03:33, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
 * ...What? Blastedt 07:14, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
 * The origional build section was ruined because of the crap@$$ vetting system. ‽-(єяøηħ)  no u 15:32, 27 June 2007 (EDT)


 * Imo the build section failed because no one wished to maintain it any longer. It was a hassle. Even though there were many advocates defending it, not one stood up to the plate and actually said they would take care of it. Readem (talk *pvxcontribs ) 15:48, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
 * Some1 finally did, i mean, if no1 had we wouldnt be here now. Steping up to the plate meant moving away from the core wiki tho. I had mentioned/suggested/pushed a build wiki for a while but was ignored, i then tried to research the costs and still got no help, so i moved on. Luckily a gew others were able to make it work. --Midnight08 16:00, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
 * Meh, no one stepped up to the plate still imo. At least none of the people who were complaining the most. Readem (talk *pvxcontribs ) 16:03, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
 * What negative attitude? The fact that I unfavored bad builds? o.o  I kept forwarding sections, and sometimes even took a random build, and worked with it to make it better.  I favored keeping it until I took a look at how many arguments were created. Blastedt 06:03, 28 June 2007 (EDT)

Moar chat
Sneaky, care to clarify so we know what you are talking about specifically? ‽-(єяøηħ) no u 04:36, 3 July 2007 (CEST)
 * :'( no response. (blastedt) 72.192.54.23 21:36, 12 October 2007 (CEST)