User:Vincent E V A N/bandwagon/

In this current moment of thought, whilst drinking my roobio tea that I just got, it's time to record the thoughts of the faggotry that infests the world that we preview from this family-friendly, thought evoking, and bipartisan (of opinions) website.

Bandwagoning: I've been seeing it a lot in my life as of late. It's weird in all honesty. Without giving anyone on this credit for this page, in real life, I recently discovered some bandwagonship from a school that takes part in Varsity debate. To keep it short, they now buy their speeches and information and distribute to their school's debaters and "allied" schools. This school is disputing with my school for the title of best debating school. I, with my debate partner, have forged an amazing debate team in little under a year. While our numbers are still limited, the quality of thinkers is astounding, especially since I live in fucking hillbilly central-- actually, I take that back, eaijkfiArn. The point being though, while we have challenged them for their name, why would they start to resort to conspicuous actions such as that? I honestly thought they were above of that, but it's clear when time's contests reach to us, the weak become known. Bandwagoning is another form of weakness. I'm not sure if I made my point above about how this relates to bandwagoning, but I can't revise it while I write, whether or not you agree with, I can assure you, you're aren't up to par with my thought process, I go to fast sometimes. Anyways, I digress; it always was mysterious to me that someone would want to blindly follow someone's objective. If you're part of a bandwagon, you are stripped away of your voice and action, two vital parts for practically every social encounter, and become a layer on someone's (fallacious) logic. Basically, you're a puppet for someone's own voice, and plus, it makes you look like an absolute fucking idiot. When I argue, I try to know my case in, out, it's pros, and it's cons. If I know everything about it, rather than what's good about it, I can further justify my case. Sometimes when it comes to arguing, it's not about how good it is vs X, but how why X is worse than Y in terms of faults.

While I hate bandwagoning with a passion, I also see it's values. Socially engineer people for your own cause? Hell yeah, that's like, lazy man's way to brainwashing. The points behind it are similar, it's just that bandwagoning is voluntary indoctrination. If I can get a group of people to follow my beliefs for a common goal, I could easily get what I want. With followers, I can cover all basis of argumentation, safeguards, and even instate a contingency to shift the argument if I need to. Arguing is always fun, especially if you can control the gears. That however, is for something later. If I can give people parts of my overall case and if they defend it, I can make it look like people know what they're talking about while also making it look like a quality 100 vs 1 argument. As we all know, humans cannot do something beyond one action, it's efficient for one person to do one, while 100 others do 100 separate things. That started mass production, and look what that brought us: thousands of multi-billion dollar corporations. I believe they got it right in regards of how people work. So, get one person to cover a section of your argument, and bam, you got yourself a strong bandwagon.

The anatomy of a bandwagon is simple. It consists of a body and a head. Nothing amazing about that. However, the body is group of sheep who fight your battles for you, while you, the thinker, are the one who chooses the battles. Choose how you want to fight, where, and which points to press. If you're the head, congratulations. However, if you are the body, fuck off and die. The body can grind my gears, but if you know how to fight a bandwagon, the argument will be nothing short but boring. I notice that many bandwagoners deny that they are one of these people. Is it a general consensus that nobody likes these vermin?

To give some pvxers some attention that, like whores who desperately need my 9 inch monstrosity (as said by Dandy), need with an unsatisfiable desire, there are the few here who are applicable for the guidelines of a bandwagon as I stated. I'll keep names in my head for my own plans, but just observing their actions makes me question the general population's priorities. The general population gets what it wants from media outlets, and depending on social hierarchy, could differ from person to person. But, to go out of your way to post bandwagon shit on a database for a dead game is just, sadly, beyond my comprehension. Maybe the answer lies in front of me, or maybe it's in the depths of social philosophy. I'm unsure, but I will find out. I also pardon myself for the passive aggressive behavior that was in the opening sentence, but it had to be said for the artistic aspect of this informal passage.

If you're the leader of a bandwagon, know that there is so much you can do. The fact that people give up their own voice for your own is one of the strongest weapons you can have in today's world. People don't think for themselves, and now that you have two, maybe three, possibly four or five voices, you can push anything in whatever direction you want, and it scares me how much this is used and still be further exploited. Vincent Evan [Air Henchman]   00:36, 26 November 2011 (UTC)