PvXwiki:Requests for adminship/Napalm Flame


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

Napalm Flame (talk &bull; contribs)

 * User:Napalm Flame declined the nomination.

Napalm has been a very valuable contributor to the wiki. He has been around for a bit, and I beleive he could be good as an admin. Ni 19:14, 2 August 2007 (CEST)


 * 'This is blasphemy! This is madness!' I accept then. - Change of plan, nah. Napalm Flame  ^_^ [[Image:Napalm_Flame_Sig_Image.JPG‎]] (talk)·(contributions) 19:16, 2 August 2007 (CEST)

Support

 * 1) Alpha fireborn 19:29, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
 * 2) (Your Vote Here)

Oppose

 * 1) Short temper...  [[Image:User Frvwfr2 signature.jpg|User:Frvwfr2]] frvwfr2  (talk · contributions) 19:30, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
 * 2) While Napalm is one of our most valued contributors, I don't believe he is what the administrative team needs. With Frvwfr2, Edru, and Skakid on the fast track to adminship, the wiki's needs are temporarily fulfilled. Perhaps at another time, when another admin is something the wiki really needs.  —ǥȓɩηɔɧ 〚₮/ḉ〛 19:47, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
 * 3) The canidate has not demonstrated extensive knowledge of the voting system, or ingame knowledge. Furthermore, he/she has not taken part in many discussions regarding policy and general talk pages, and does not seem to contribute much to the Wiki outside of writing the odd PvE build. Has not proven that he/she would become an effective administrator, and giving this canidate Administrative powers may prove to be more harmful than good. &mdash;  Rapta  [[image:Rapta_Icon1.gif|19px]] (talk|contribs) 20:09, 8 August 2007 (CEST)
 * 4) Probably wouldn't be a bad admin, but there are other candidates who are more qualified at the time. I was suprised to initially find out that skakid wasn't an admin.Bob fregman 03:15, 9 August 2007 (CEST)
 * 5) (Your Vote Here)

Neutral

 * 1) Misfate [[Image:Rune Elementalist Sup.png|20px]] 21:36, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
 * 2) I have to say, you're my friend and all, and you're a great contributor, but you do have a temper (and it's gotten you banned via NPA). I don't know. -- Armond Warblade[[Image:Armond sig image.png]] 01:25, 3 August 2007 (CEST)
 * 3) As Grinch says, a valuable contributor, but, that has to be weighed against what does appear to be a short fuse as well as a lack of contributions to namespaces like PvXwiki: or PvXwiki Talk: that would distinguish you from other candidates. While I have certainly seen many of your edits, I simply feel that those edits are not enough to give an accurate picture of how you would act as an Admin, and without something solid to go on, promotion seems like a big leap of faith at the moment.  [[Image:DE Sig Test 2.jpg|50x19px]]  *Defiant Elements*   +talk  01:28, 3 August 2007 (CEST)
 * 4) See DE's comment. Tycn 16:40, 11 August 2007 (CEST)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.