| Archives | ||
A/any Vaettir Farm[]
Was moved without an agreement being reached on the talk page. I moved it back until more people get the chance to voice their opinions on the matter. ApplesaucePancakes 07:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- You don't need concensus for small changes. It has no critical effect on anything, and I'd already cured all links to the page. The "_HM" bit of the name was a relic of the build name which should never have been there. ALSO you forgot to suppress redirects.
Chieftain Alex 07:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- Resolved, build is now at Build:A/Me Vaettir Farm. -- Toraen talk 14:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
User Merge?[]
I don't recall seeing any pages on pvx like Guild Wars Wiki:Requests for user merge - but would you do whatever the procedure is for User:Shadow (new) & User:Shadow Form Slayer (old) Chieftain Alex 12:53, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
- Only Requires votes though Shadow 12:59, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Silven Shadow (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
See his talk page. Has literally never been constructive in the slightest, posts flame-worthy crap and defends himself by calling everybody scrubs. --Jai. - 01:28, November 22 2011 (UTC)
- You may want to check, because I've actually been correct in every instance. The AB build was outdated, the ER build sucked and still does the 3rd time around. Actually check your history instead of just assuming. In the case of pvx, the majority is rarely correct, mainly because they're sheep. --Silven Shadow 05:47, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, you'd be a great judge of your own correctness... Anyway, whether you were right or not is irrelevent here, as you were obviously not contributing to the discussions, but simply using personal attacks (which, by the way, is a bannable offense). If someone (from America) were to go around and say "FUCK JEWS AND MUSLIMS AND HINDIS THEY'RE ALL FAGS!!!11!1!" they might be "right" from a majority standpoint in that they're supporting the religion of the majority, but that doesn't make their opinions any more valid. --Jai. - 06:00, November 22 2011 (UTC)
- Not the place to rant jai...--Relyk 07:44, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
- Just one last thing before I stop clogging up the AN: I don't even necessarily have issue with Silven's standpoint on the builds he's "contributed" to, but simply how he goes about
flamingtrollingarguing stuff. If Silven can prove that most of his comments have actually been constructive (which doesn't include calling people sheep, scrubs, shit, etc.), then I'll eat my words. --Jai. - 12:38, November 22 2011 (UTC)- Jai was before me, but I too want to say he's highly annoying and is just being a big obstacle Shadow 14:24, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
- Just one last thing before I stop clogging up the AN: I don't even necessarily have issue with Silven's standpoint on the builds he's "contributed" to, but simply how he goes about
- Not the place to rant jai...--Relyk 07:44, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, you'd be a great judge of your own correctness... Anyway, whether you were right or not is irrelevent here, as you were obviously not contributing to the discussions, but simply using personal attacks (which, by the way, is a bannable offense). If someone (from America) were to go around and say "FUCK JEWS AND MUSLIMS AND HINDIS THEY'RE ALL FAGS!!!11!1!" they might be "right" from a majority standpoint in that they're supporting the religion of the majority, but that doesn't make their opinions any more valid. --Jai. - 06:00, November 22 2011 (UTC)
Jai was banned for commenting when he knew to stop (even being warned). Shadow was banned for commenting for no reason. Silven has been warned and I will keep an eye out and decide if further action is needed. ~ PheNaxKian talk 17:39, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Protected pages, autoban, some help[]
Hey Phen/Toraen/Fellow admins, I wanted to ask how it is possible I got an autoban (Other bans looked very different) and I get to see no "edit" button, because it says every page is "protected". Shadow 19:07, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- And now it has been fixed now I re-opened Chrome, sorry :S Shadow 19:08, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- autoban is when you're using an IP that is currently banned (and has autoban enabled). ~ PheNaxKian talk 19:35, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- Never had that before though, that message Shadow 19:37, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- autoban is when you're using an IP that is currently banned (and has autoban enabled). ~ PheNaxKian talk 19:35, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Excluded (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
Is massive, massive, massive drama a bannable offense? Because Minion's made months of it. If you want to ban me for essentially feeding him for so long, I wouldn't put up too much of a fight. --Jai. - 04:49, December 5 2011 (UTC)
- Toraen is already following the discussion afaik. He would have taken action earlier if I had done anything wrong (or be told to stop). ~Ӎiñon
05:01, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- Besides, pvx would be boring if excluded was gone, there'd be no drama to keep us interested! Roland 05:06, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- This is the last warning any of you will ever get to not discuss stuff on this noticeboard. This is incredibly lenient considering two people were banned in the above section for this very thing. If you absolutely feel the need to comment on something on this noticeboard use the talk page. To clarify, it is inappropriate for Excluded to comment in a section specifically complaining about his behaviour and Roland's comment was one of the most useless I have ever seen on this noticeboard. Don't do it in future. People can consider this a blanket warning, I will simply ban in the future. A new misery 10:03, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- Besides, pvx would be boring if excluded was gone, there'd be no drama to keep us interested! Roland 05:06, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Chieftain_Alex (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
Violation of PvX:1RV here and refusal to self revert here. Discussion of which version is appropriate is pending on which version of the page is appropriate, but I have no intention of entering into a revert war. A new misery 12:52, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- I feel a ban is unneeded. Both parties were acting with good intentions , and all involved are now discussing the changes (and Ska has been warned by yourself). Unless the reverting continues, there's no need for intervention. ~ PheNaxKian talk 20:09, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
97.125.100.13 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
General NPA & unconstructive edits - All the edits appear to be a logged out user, you can ID him fairly easily with checkuser.
[1]
[2]
[3]
npa
And then to top it off, he recommends threatening Jai with a ban: -- Chieftain Alex 07:45, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- That is my ip, was having issues logging in, also where's the NPA? When has it been against policy to inform admins of asshattery. I am however guilty of replacing the word "toe" with "penis". ApplesaucePancakes 09:49, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- I've warned the user in question. A new misery 10:55, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Quebra sites (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
Hi enormous, once more Shadow 
Christmas Signature 19:05, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Banned. For the record shadow, don't post on his talks or respond to him at all anymore. -- Toraen talk 19:26, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Character creation (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
Obvious sock is v. obvious. Also, his other accounts are probably the other two new ones: Brain damage and Lsd corporation. Vincent Evan [Air Henchman] 
22:54, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Archived tested GvG builds[]
When hitting the "next 200" button on http://www.gwpvx.com/Category:Archived_tested_GvG_builds I get the url http://www.gwpvx.com/index.php?title=Category:Archived_tested_GvG_builds&pagefrom=P%2Fany+Soldier%27s+Fury+Paragon%0AP%2Fany+Soldier%27s+Fury+Paragon but I stay at the first page.
I assume this might be better off at another place but couldn't find it (curse noticeboard maybe?). So please move if appropriate. Steve1 11:21, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- It's already on curse noticeboard. It affects all categories with >200 members. -- Toraen talk 15:34, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Curse appear to have resolved this, it was working yesterday too but I forgot to comment.
Chieftain Alex 08:34, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
- Curse appear to have resolved this, it was working yesterday too but I forgot to comment.
Rask[]
Countless NPA and poking at new members when told to stop harassing us by admin. Open racism with no attempt to hide what he thinks of Fianchetto and I and his conduct when rating the past few builds have been suspect to votebalancing. Sorry Toraen; I was already typing this when you banned him. Jazz 
Discuss 06:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
HerpDerp (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
I'd like to make a remark that Herp is making unnecessary edits (under the sign of "Qwak") and does not listen to Phen. Shadow Talk 22:20, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- I agree with Shadow. Besides my past confrontations with him, he is acting below is intelligence. Vincent Evan [Air Henchman] 22:21, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
173.254.216.68 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
See here. Quak aka minion/jerplerp evading ban. RąʂKɭɘş♣14/f/japan 18:55, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
- Blocked. Frostels 19:06, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
84.13.249.214 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
HerpDerp evading his ban. RąʂKɭɘş♣14/f/japan 19:05, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- Not enough evidence for this, and there's no harmful edits from this IP. -- Toraen confer 19:37, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
31.172.30.3 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
See here. Quak evading ban. RąʂKɭɘş♣14/f/japan 05:45, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Rask (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
- Polar voting. User could do with learning to vote properly. (hey there 0, 1, 5) Chieftain Alex 12:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
- I don't see a specific problem with polar voting. He is at least being consistent, it's not really our job to define what an acceptable spread of votes is. If you wish to discuss this further feel free to hit me up on my talk page. A new misery 13:00, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
95.57.175.33 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
Weird text and removing things in my sandbox, probably the start of an annoying IP -- Shadow Talk with me :D 13:56, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Brandy mice (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
and 82.219.14.141 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log). It's an odd couple :S. -- Shadow Talk with me :D 13:20, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
- Same person. Talked to them. A new misery 13:23, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
- Ban pl0x. With Love ♣ RąʂKɭɘş 14:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
- Yes sir. A new misery 14:26, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
- Ban pl0x. With Love ♣ RąʂKɭɘş 14:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
95.57.193.231 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
Obvious violation -- Shadow Step 16:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Soi Sticker (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
Violation of 1RV here: [4] 
03:29, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
And here: [5] --Jai 69.246.163.213 03:38, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
- Axe Tank issue has been resolved. Soi was right about Alex's page though, and I'd advise not doing anything like that in the future. -- Toraen confer 05:34, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
AkkAtte (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log) / 88.112.212.60 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
Putting videos up on all the farming builds to promote his channel, even for builds that already have perfectly adequate vids already, and with videos that are no better than the previous ones. --Jai. - 20:19, April 22 2012 (UTC)
- The only edit after the warnings (here) was an addition to the existing videos. I'm fine with him adding a video or two to a build as long as he doesn't remove the existing ones with no reason. If they're crappy quality then his videos can be removed, but otherwise ^__^.-- Toraen confer 20:27, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- His edits are in good faith and his videos are great quality. I've appended his videos if there wasn't a reason to replace currents vids--Relyk 21:24, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
They (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
Just check recent ratings, derp. --Jai. - 03:48, May 2 2012 (UTC)
- Sorted. A new misery 07:33, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
They (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
- "Fianchetto McFaggotFace Cool your tits bro"
- Really rask.. Cɥıǝɟʇɐıu Alǝx 22:17, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
- While quotes are nice, links to the actual edit are the thing we actually need. (I mean I found it, but the point is if you have an issue you should be linking us to it so we don't have to dig through contributions for it, especially when the page isn't mentioned, it could be anywhere). ~ PheNaxKian talk 00:43, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Minion (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
Just to make sure it's seen (from here): --Jai
- Don't post the damn conversation Jai, a link suffices. ~ PheNaxKian talk 15:03, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Relyk (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
use of tag to violate NPA [6]. i cried. also, he obviously doesn't know what he's talking about, it's a working setup not a troll page. gg. ♟Fianchetto 
18:34, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Soi Sticker (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
Since Soi is Minion's sock, should all of his/its votes be removed? Also, what about Minion's votes? The few votes of Soi that I could find from Recent Ratings, his talk page, and a little searching: [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] this one would remove the 5th vote
--Jai. - 20:06, May 25 2012 (UTC)
- Apart from markway (oversight I think), Minion/Soi votes don't exist on the same build. Cɥıǝɟʇɐıu Alǝx 20:21, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
FoolzPermaSwag (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
NPA violation, see here 22:42, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- You're going to post this on AN when swag was reverting your vandalism?--Relyk 23:23, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Wanding was the only DPS on the build, pretty sure my suggestion increased overall damage by.... 33%? 16:42, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- Wanding was the only DPS on the build, pretty sure my suggestion increased overall damage by.... 33%?
Fianchetto (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
Violation of 1RV here. Has a bad habit of making senseless edits just to make pages conform to his own personal standards. 16:22, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- User warned. Edit reverted. A new misery 07:51, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Chieftain Alex (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
Violation of NPA here. Not his first time being a dick using edit summaries. 23:29, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Silent (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
Troll editing/vandalizing the chopway page here 23:29, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- No action required. Vandalism already reverted. A new misery 07:51, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Fianchetto (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)[]
Violation of [1RV]. Trying to downplay a build through meaningless wordplay: "The player build is less popular than Esurge/Panic, but the hero build is meta in nearly any hero team." Vs. "The player build typically only sees use in spikes, but the hero build is meta in nearly any hero team.". This is like the fourth time he's done it (recently) and in general his edits are meaningless and serve only to meet his personal standards, not the communities. Also he's autistic with attri spreads. 03:53, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- Banned by Big. Given that this is at least his third 1RV incident (and we let him go with warnings those times) I don't have much of a problem that the ban is longer than usual for 1RV. -- Toraen confer 23:48, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Fianchetto trashvoted [[Build:P/W Chopagon]], [[Build:R/W PvE Turret Ranger]], and Archive:Team - DoA Axeway so he could tag the first two for trash and push the latter to Good. As far as I'm concerned, he's purposely undermining the vetting system of the wiki whether or not his votes are valid and can kindly fuck off the wiki permanently. I've already told him to stop before but he's continued to troll shit and fuck with the wiki and most of his contributions haven't been constructive at all. He's made it obvious he no longer wishes to contribute in a positive manner to the wiki. This might be a personal grudge, but doing this crap right after he gets his ban shortened pisses me off.--Relyk 05:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- I removed the vote on DoA Axeway because he is still being ridiculous and his vote on the Turret Ranger was pretty bad, but so was Jake's. I think you are looking at events with blinders on here. He voted on quite a few builds. This may shock you to hear, but his votes may have actually been that these votes are in line with his opinion and not part of some deeper conspiracy. A new misery 15:49, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
{{Mssg}} Fix[]
Good morning PvX. Long time no edit. An easy request for one of you. Please copy the code at User:Chieftain Alex/Code Sandbox to Template:Mssg - the latter is protected and so I can't patch it myself with code to fix the categories on the old flux build pages (i.e. non-current-flux builds in the mainspace with the archived tag). That code should fix the problem. -- Chieftain Alex 11:05, 5 July 2014 (UTC)