1. Archive 1

Builds that aren't collected fully

  1. Build:A/any Slaver's Exile Runner

Anyone who finds more can add them to this list. -Toraen (talk) 12:05, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Without trying to read the python script - is that simply because it's an ununsual case with mulitiple builds on a single page that is not a "team" build? -Chieftain Alex (talk) 16:28, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Exactly that. Should be fixable with just variantbar (though I should probably add an option to it to start out expanded, for some builds it would make more sense). -Toraen (talk) 22:28, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
I've gone over all builds in the Build: namespace and added variantbars where it seemed to make sense. There are 12 more pages (5 of which aren't teams) I'll do later and a couple of teams that were too messy to dive into. I added some more notes on the variantbar talk page.
By the way, will the bot also grab the builds from the Beginner Team? If they end up in a team folder for each subpage it might be good to make an exclusion list for them. --Krschkr (talk) 01:51, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Sorry for not responding to this earlier. The main page for the beginner team (the heroes) is all collected normally, the subpages containing the player builds are not since they do not fall in any vetted category on their own. I did have to make some changes to the script to handle the changes to variantbar and PvXCode 2.0. The build packs are updated as of today and I didn't see any glaring issues in the folders I checked. -Toraen (talk) 17:38, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Single-build team builds

A short note, just in case someone checks their build pack and wonders where these two files come from.

Aforementioned pages only feature a single build, which results in them being considered a single build rather than a team by the build pack script. The result is that they appear as a single file rather than (as with the other teams) in a subfolder, which creates no further problems. Because of this and the circumstance that it's not to be expected that (many) more cases like these pop up, I don't see the need for a change of the script. --Krschkr (talk) 14:22, 11 July 2021 (UTC)